From: Douglas G. Logan <douglas.logan@gte.net>

Subject: Our conversation

Date: February 22, 2012 11:08:10 AM PST

To: David Greifinger tracklaw@verizon.net

David,

Good to hear from you.

Pursuant to our conversation, following is the best recollection of the issue(s) we discussed.

The onerous termination language included in the Nike contract was, in my recollection, a series of provisions carried over from the prior agreement. When I attempted to mitigate these provisions on behalf of USATF I was unable to. However, I received assurances that the only way they would try to enforce these clauses was if there were other substantive reasons for termination.

I made absolutely no oral promises nor did I represent they were entitled to any rights other than those expressed in the contract. I did assure them I would aggressively enforce the rights which they were acquiring.

If asked to testify I would assert my belief that athlete uniforms in domestic competitions are outside the scope of rights acquired by Nike and not material [excuse the cheap pun].

I hope this is helpful and clarifying.

Doug

Douglas G. Logan

917-609-8175