It is not pointless to discuss the article. The article is out there in the public domain and is fair game. As many on here have already stated, the writer did an inadequate job in disclosing any information that could not already be found on the first 100 pages of this thread. His delivery was impressive, but his substance was woefully lacking.
Many of on here are wondering why Singer did not ask the hard questions. It is a fair question to ask.
I asked this last week; what in the world makes you think he didn't ask 'hard' questions?