|
 Where Your Dreams Become Reality |
|
You are reporting the following post to the moderators for review and possible removal from the forum Poster: Holy Kablooey Batman Subject: RE: Teachers: Should you be paid based on performance? Body:
Nobody could be that stupid could they? Seriously? Student A - growth infinite. What, did you just master fractions and you really want to show off that you know that dividing by zero doesn't work very well? And this is supposed to be germane to the topic? No damned way you are that stupid! Student B already knows how to read when he comes to class and still knows how to read when he leaves therefore he hasn't grown? Seriously? This is your argument? You mean that there is no way to measure different levels of reading comprehension? Seriously? No damned way you are that stupid! Student C interacts with non-teachers and therefore teacher performance simply cannot be measured? HJMFC! Seriously? No friggin' chance you are that stupid! Student D can't hold a tune therefore there is no way to measure teacher performance? There is nothing more to learning about music than the quality of one's voice? Seriously? Aint no way, aint no how you could be that stupid! Sorry dude but you shouldn't make it so obvious that you are just trying to make status quo teachers look bad. This is true for both ethical and practical reasons. On the practical side, you aren't fooling anyone with arguments that would be easily refuted by a retarded earthworm. On the ethical side, it just is not right to even try to make teachers look bad. Most teachers (like most professionals) are good at their job and are trying to make a positive difference. It just isn't right to try to make them look like morons. Hit the submit button below if you want us to review the post. If you feel this is urgent or want a reply, email us at letsrun@letsrun.com about the post and please include a link to the thread the post is on and what page number/post on that page it is
|
