Where Your Dreams Become Reality

Non-SMA120x60NT

What's Let's Run.com?

Highschool Front Page

Training Advice

More News in Our:
News Section!

Message Boards
Main Message Board

Turn Back The Clock! Today's Top Runners Talk About Their High School Careers

RECOMMENDED
READS

Comments, questions, suggestions, story you'd like to submit?
Email us

 
You are reporting the following post to the moderators for review and possible removal from the forum

Poster: gypsy
Subject: RE: Renato Canova - Arthur Lydiard Coaches Roundtable
Body:


just for the record wrote:

Renato Canova by Renato Canova

The main points that characterize my phylosophy are as follows :

a) Aerobic training is the most important part of the preparation. Without a wide aerobic base, in my opinion it's not possible to reach the top personal level. In this I have the same idea of Lydiard.
the similarity is general and is the same as every training pyramid you've ever seen - endurance is at the bottom and is the biggest component. The differences in how both approach this is monumental.


c) The "Aerobic First" of Lydiard was the compensation of the lack of aerobic strength for people having a very high muscle strength. When the athletes of 1960 approached athletics, they were already very strong under the point of view of their muscle strength. They didn't use long run, but normally plaid sports as rugby, soccer, basket, football that gave power to their body. So, we can say that the RUNNERS of 50 years ago needed essentially long aerobic runs for supporting a high lactic capacity already in their characteristics, while African needs to increase that quality, starting directly with running and being weaker under the muscular point of view.
it is not wise to generalise yet i can say generally in these two countries most of the people who run do not play rugby AFL etc - so the muscular strength thing is a myth. Lydiard himself is an exception of course and Snell was a mesomorphic animal, yet Cerutty and Elliot were not muscular people and had to develop that side of it all.


d) After no longer than 2-3 years, easy long run doesn't produce any effect. If somebody thinks the process of capillarization can last for ever, he's wrong. After opening ALL THE VESSELS that is possible to open in his body (and this happens during the first 3 years, if his training is enough), the only way for increasing the Aerobic Power is the intensity. In this point I'm very far from Lydiard.
for starters it not just opening all of the blood vessels its creating new ones.


e) Aerobic doesn't mean slow running. Now the WR of Marathon is at a pace of 2:55 per km or 4:41 per mile, AND IS FULLY AEROBIC. So, we can use from the beginning of the preparation (Fundamental period) this type of speed WITHOUT TOUCHING THE LACTIC SYSTEM. The idea that short and medium intervals are anaerobic is wrong : this depends on the speed, not on the distance. For that reason, I use ALWAYS this type of training, without fearing to burn the athletes. Also in this case, I'm very far from Lydiard.
so he thinks but the fact is best aerobic pace is all about long fast running.


f) In my training phylosophy, TRAINING IS INDIVIDUAL. Training is like the cloth for an athletes, and the coach is his taylor. You can see a model you like in a shop, but it's casual the size of the cloth in the window is your size. So, the MODEL is the training phylosophy, the SIZE is the individual program of the athlete.
yet another Canova analogy, like an aerobic house which actually should just be seen as then foundations, or the chef who throws all his vegetables into the pot at the same time and expects a good meal - i would use the analogy fo a master chef making a prize winning cake over some kitchen hack throwing everything in together in that analogy. Anyway its good to hear Canova trains his athletes individually.


h) The succession of different periods of training (Fundamental, Special and Specific) involves different training phylosophies.
and he calls his system non-linear periodisation - these phases look pretty linear to me.


i) Being the training with the direct influence, THE GOAL IS TO INCREASE DURING YEARS THE VOLUME OF SPECIFIC TRAINING: MORE QUANTITY OF SPECIFIC TRAINING WE ARE ABLE TO DO, FASTER WE CAN RUN.
yet three years goes by an no more faster running ... perhaps there is a problem here with your philosphy? For example if we take your philosohpy to its natural extreme we get 100% specific training and 0% non-specific. The Soviets realised there had to be a balance
between specific and general and you clearly do not realise this.



l) Because the Specific Training has a cost, if we do more specific training, we spend more energies, AND WE NEED MORE RECOVERY.
And reduce volume of training and so miss out on aerobic capacity which falls further and further behind the athletes aerobic power. IN the end this imbalance creates - no more improvement.

This analogy worked on a 17 year old runner from HS in Florida so i bet you smart people can get it too.

Your aerobic system can be seen as a set of bellows. You know with the bag and the funnel and you pump it to blow air on a fire to increase the flames.

aerobic capacity = this bag
aerobic power = the funnel

increase aerobic capacity you increase the size of the bag
increase aerobic power and you increase the length of the funnel

-increase the bag without increasing the funnel and you find you cant push out the air any faster
-increase the funnel and not the bag and you strain yourself trying to push the air out of the bag fast enough

this last one is what Canova is doing and it leads to a strained system

the solution it to keep them in balance

ps a great Aussie coach, largely unheralded put that image in my mind some years ago - cheers to him Peter kehoe - maybe one of the sharpest MD minds i have come across
Hit the submit button below if you want us to review the post. If you feel this is urgent or want a reply, email us at letsrun@letsrun.com about the post and please include a link to the thread the post is on and what page number/post on that page it is
Your name:

 

Quantcast