You are reporting the following post to the moderators for review and possible removal from the forum

RE: Earlier races
Those 10,000+ finishers include participants in the marathon, half-marathon, 5K and wheelchair and other events. It looks like 643 runners completed the 5k. If you look at the gun/chip time differentials of the top ten, tenth place has a 20-second gap. Everyone else is within one to two seconds except Kip in 6th with his 2:18 gap. You have to scroll down to runners in the 25:00 chip time range before you find other 2:00+ differentials. There's something I don't get about the results page, though, because it consistently says 643 finishers but the last set of results lists finish orders up to 1523. What am I missing?

Zapruder wrote:

This just looks all around goofy. Can a 19:15 really get you 6th place in a 5K with over 10000 finishers?

Assuming it can, how the hell could you run that fast while trying to pass thousand of people in a 5K.

[quote]Race detective wrote:

Here are some more back-of-the-pack starts with decent placements:

2) Detroit Free Press 5K (10/29/06)

2:18 start delay. 19:15. 6th of 10726 finishers. Masters winner. Start delay is more consistent with those finishing at 28 minutes and slower, not someone trying to win the masters division.


Hit the submit button below if you want us to review the post.

If you feel this is urgent or want a reply, email us at [email protected] about the post and please include a link to the thread the post is on and what page number/post on that page it is.