|
 Where Your Dreams Become Reality |
|
You are reporting the following post to the moderators for review and possible removal from the forum Poster: dnixon Subject: RE: Time for an Honest Assessment of Ritz's Performance Body: I think Ritz said he thought he was in 2:06-2:07 shape, or am I mistaken? And I think he said he'd be disappointed with 2:08. I'm in agreement with you: his goals need to be in sync with his physical abilities, and it probably would've been better for him to shoot for the 2:08 range, but we weren't privy to his training and times, and maybe there were indicators that he could run 2:9=07. Don't know. Maybe some of the responsibility lies with the coach? As for comparing a 3:59/4:00 mile with a 2:09:59/2:10:00, i don't think they're the same thing. My opinion. There's still a real mystique to breaking the 4:00 minute mile. Hit the submit button below if you want us to review the post. If you feel this is urgent or want a reply, email us at letsrun@letsrun.com about the post and please include a link to the thread the post is on and what page number/post on that page it is
|
