Where Your Dreams Become Reality

Non-SMA120x60NT

What's Let's Run.com?

Highschool Front Page

Training Advice

More News in Our:
News Section!

Message Boards
Main Message Board

Turn Back The Clock! Today's Top Runners Talk About Their High School Careers

RECOMMENDED
READS

Comments, questions, suggestions, story you'd like to submit?
Email us

 
You are reporting the following post to the moderators for review and possible removal from the forum

Poster: Still Married and Happy
Subject: RE: Post-nuptial shutoff?
Body:


rapture wrote:

Wow, I have to say I feel sorry for MOST of you guys. I have been with my wife for 6 years and married for over two now...and honestly it’s been great. Maybe there’s been a slight decline in action which would be due less to being married and more because our lives are busier in general. We have replaced the more meaningless stuff with that which is a lot more exciting. I won’t throw any number out there, least to say she wants it probably more than I and we are both very satisfied. We’re both young so I suppose that plays in our favor….but I can’t see age changing anything for us except maybe with the addition of children in our lives, when it eventually happens.

In my opinion there’s nothing wrong with 'playing the field' well into your 60's or 70's if that’s what you so choose to do. Why should anyone get married for the sake of upholding social structure and fulfilling social norms? The only reason one might not play the field when single at such an age, would be due to the influence of others. As much as many of us don’t like to think of it our elders are privy to the same natural drives as you or I. It's BS that your expected to shrivel up and die without staying sexually active. I say if it works for you then do it. There’s nothing wrong with casual sex or commitment sex, one is no better than the other...it’s about what you want as an individual-regardless of age.


You are missing the point, Rapture. No one should get married to uphold a social structure. People should get married because they believe love is real (as people like Jean Jacques Rousseau and Jane Austen did, among others), that real love is a source of happiness on this earth, and that they have found someone they love and who they believe does and will love them back. That is the only reason to get married.

There are two types of bachelors. The type I described in the above post (the stud who morphs through his own choices and shallowness into a pathetic sort of figure), and the bachelor who genuinely believes and yearns for love, but for some reason has been unlucky in finding it. The former person is an object of disdain, the latter an object of sympathy.

If someone professes to not believe in true love, by all means they shouldn't marry. They can play the field into their 60s or whatever, but I suspect they are never quite as happy as they profess themselves to be. There have been some recent studies that show life-long married folks to be happier in general.

You seem to be confusing the right to play the field with my point that such a choice is certainly open and available to anyone in a free society, but it has real consequences. People have and always will make value judgments. They could no longer excuse themselves from the moral realm of making value judgments as they could excuse themselves from breathing oxygen. Man is the great esteemer (Plato).

We are and always will be defined by the choices we make. Choose carefully.

Peace.
Hit the submit button below if you want us to review the post. If you feel this is urgent or want a reply, email us at letsrun@letsrun.com about the post and please include a link to the thread the post is on and what page number/post on that page it is
Your name:

 

Quantcast