Josh Hamilton's Addiction wrote:
To the tiny few Armstrong defenders that are still out there,
I think LR is misconstruing people who think the overt rants against Lance Armstrong are slightly unprofessional, and obviously overboard, with "defenders." I doubt anyone here defends Armstrong as innocent, but nobody outside of Letsrun's staff has gone so tangentially awry on these boards, flaming the already debased cyclist.
Agreed. We get it. You don't like Lance because he doped. It's time to let it go.
Actually, you apparently don't get it.
Folks who passionately hate Lance do not do so because he doped. They do so because he went out of his way to destroy the careers, and to the extent possible the personal lives, of those who had the audacity to tell the truth. This is indeed a reasonable reason to absolutely despise the guy.
From Dan Wetzel's article:
3. Let's talk Betsy Andreu, the wife of one your former teammates, Frankie. Both Andreus testified under oath that they were in a hospital room in 1996 when you admitted to a doctor to using EPO, HGH and steroids. You responded by calling them "vindictive, bitter, vengeful and jealous." And that's the stuff we can say on TV.
Would you now label them as "honest"?
And what would you say directly to Betsy, who dealt with a voicemail from one of your henchmen that included, she's testified, this:
"I hope somebody breaks a baseball bat over your head. I also hope that one day you have adversity in your life and you have some type of tragedy that will definitely make an impact on you."
When you heard about that voicemail, why didn't you call Betsy and apologize then?
6. What do you say to Emma O'Reilly, who was a young Dublin native when she was first hired by the U.S. Postal team to give massages to the riders after races?
In the early 2000s, she told stories of rampant doping and how she was used to transport the drugs across international borders. In the USADA report, she testified that you tried to "make my life hell."
Her story was true, Lance, wasn't it? And you knew it was true. Yet despite knowing it was true, you, a famous multimillionaire superstar, used high-priced lawyers to sue this simple woman for more money than she was worth in England, where slander laws favor the famous. She had no chance to fight it.
She testified that you tried to ruin her by spreading word that she was a prostitute with a heavy drinking problem.
"The traumatizing part," she once told the New York Times, "was dealing with telling the truth."
Do you want to apologize to her? Not in general. I mean directly and by name. I mean, Lance, of all the people to attack like that, of all the people you had power and wealth over, you had to go after her? How Lance, could you do this to someone, and why would anyone want to believe again in someone capable of doing this to someone?
Somehow I think that if either of these women were your wife, sister or mother you might think there really is reason to hate this guy.
Sorry, but it's not about the PEDs. It's about this guy being a supreme asshole
To combat message board spam by non runners, we are making people answer a brief question before they can post on a thread that is over 20 days old.
If you answer this question you will be able to post.
Who of the following is not an American runner?