This kind of crap is what you get when you force people to live with muslims, while the politician who made the law is behind walls in a white rich neighborhood.
This kind of crap is what you get when you force people to live with muslims, while the politician who made the law is behind walls in a white rich neighborhood.
New Zealand is less than 5 million people, or 65x less than USA. Assuming the death count is 50, multiplying gives a ratio of 3250+ if it had been USA, way more than anything except 9/11. And yet ppl think this doesn't happen other places?
And how many mosques are there in Christchurch, anyway?
Sad! wrote:
Or maybe he's just trolling wrote:
"I chose firearms for the affect (sic) it would have on civil discourse"
Indeed, bombs are much more efficient than guns (firearms) when you come down to it.
Maybe we'll never know his motives....
Shortly before the attack, he published a 73-page ‘manifesto’ in which he vowed “revenge” against Muslim “invaders.” According to reports, he also wrote that he was inspired by right-wing terrorist Anders Breivik, who killed 77 people in Norway in 2011.
He apparently picked the particular mosque to attack because a church once stood at the same place. He also mentioned a 2017 terrorist attack in Stockholm where five people died. One of them was an 11-year-old girl, who the shooter wrote he would avenge.
Herman1 wrote:
This kind of crap is what you get when you force people to live with muslims, while the politician who made the law is behind walls in a white rich neighborhood.
You are inciting violence. You are being tracked hopefully.
He is a terrorist FFS wrote:
Sad! wrote:
Maybe we'll never know his motives....
Motives?! Are you actually insane?!
His motive was to kill innocent people. Muslims.
He’s a racist terrorist.
Islam isn't a race, it is a religion.
what are you talking about? wrote:
He is a terrorist FFS wrote:
Motives?! Are you actually insane?!
His motive was to kill innocent people. Muslims.
He’s a racist terrorist.
Islam isn't a race, it is a religion.
Effing Moran.
Cultural racism. You need to be educated.
Why isn’t anyone asking where the shooter was radicalized? People on both sides of the gun control issue continue to make these tragedies into political opportunities and ignore the root cause of the problems.
Subway Surfers wrote:
NZ has just as strong gun control laws as the UK or Australia.
Get your facts even half right before you post, you moron. The Uk has way tougher gun control laws than New Zealand, it's not remotely close. All handguns are banned (that is, any weapon with a barrel less than 12 inches including target pistols) as well as all semi automatics guns including shotguns that can hold more than two cartridges. And all individual weapons have to be registered, unlike New Zealand.
There are only 154,000 firearms licences in the Uk, which has a population of over 66 million, compared to 246,000 licences in New zealand which has a population of just under 5 million. You do the math.
How many times?! wrote:
what are you talking about? wrote:
Islam isn't a race, it is a religion.
Effing Moran.
Cultural racism. You need to be educated.
Seriously, WTF is that? I agree that this was motivated by hate, a hate of a religion. Not due to there race, which Islam is not a race. It is a religion. Islam means submit to God, not people of middle eastern origin.
Herman1 wrote:
This kind of crap is what you get when you force people to live with muslims, while the politician who made the law is behind walls in a white rich neighborhood.
The gunman literally moved to another country to target Muslims, so stop talking p!ss.
what are you talking about? wrote:
How many times?! wrote:
Effing Moran.
Cultural racism. You need to be educated.
Seriously, WTF is that? I agree that this was motivated by hate, a hate of a religion. Not due to there race, which Islam is not a race. It is a religion. Islam means submit to God, not people of middle eastern origin.
Before you decided to play this stupid game, you are of course aware that Brenton Tarantino describes himself in his own manifesto as RACIST.
Do a bit of research.
Racism has been banned. The problem is we can't ban crazy, deranged people.
I was ignorant of that. But in general, when people call people who hate Muslims/Islam 'racist'. That is stupid. Just look up 'how do I convert to Islam.' Nothing about converting is about race. It is about a belief that there is no God but Allah, and that Muhammad is the Messenger of God.
https://www.islamreligion.com/articles/204/how-to-convert-to-islam-and-become-muslim/Yes you were ignorant of that, and that's why you look so foolish.
"Extremist rightwing" wrote:
Australian born citizen. Don't let these ppl into your country.
This proves how important border security is. We need to finish the wall.
Ciro wrote:
Yes you were ignorant of that, and that's why you look so foolish.
Ignorant means without knowing, not foolish.
down she goes wrote:
Pookie Washington wrote:
Your racist fathers and grandfathers could have said the same thing about desegregation here in AmeriKKKa. You are a disgusting human being.
Desegregation has been the downfall of America. What used to be a great country with wonderful white majority cities has been reduced to a parasite state that has near completely sucked the blood out of the working class whites while reducing the cities to 3rd world wastelands. 50%+ of US cities have now been turned to dirty, dangerous ghetto thanks to traitorous policies.
Adorable story. What policies do you propose?
Allah is God wrote:
Ciro wrote:
Yes you were ignorant of that, and that's why you look so foolish.
Ignorant means without knowing, not foolish.
It's possible to be without knowledge, express views on a topic and then look foolish when most everyone else knows the opposite is true. Let it go kid.
the people who die on Gaza and Cisjordan are many times over this shooting, every year
Ciro wrote:
Allah is God wrote:
Ignorant means without knowing, not foolish.
It's possible to be without knowledge, express views on a topic and then look foolish when most everyone else knows the opposite is true. Let it go kid.
If someone shots up a place of worship, it is reasonable to assume they did it base off of religion, not race.