Alexandria Ocasio Cortez is very beautiful

Gail Hightower wrote:

I know: what’s my point? Well, I don’t have one. So there.

She's smoking hot compared to other female politicians, but for the population in general, I would give her an 8.

Small Pond wrote:

Gail Hightower wrote:

I know: what’s my point? Well, I don’t have one. So there.

She's smoking hot compared to other female politicians, but for the population in general, I would give her an 8.

Assuming you mean 8/10, that's pretty dang high.

Your point is? Stalin looked very handsome as a young man, ended up mass murdering in the tens of millions.

Yes, she is good looking. Rather good bones. Smile is a little off, too much teeth. Maybe just a little long with a little bit of recession in the midface. These are small things, still well above average. Decent, but not amazing, eyes; although in some photos they look a little mediocre.

Hard to tell on skin quality...but makeup is a powerful thing.

Akskcjdjxj wrote:

Small Pond wrote:

She's smoking hot compared to other female politicians, but for the population in general, I would give her an 8.

Assuming you mean 8/10, that's pretty dang high.

Well I would say she deserves at least a 9. I mean she’s certainly more attractive than 9 out of 10 women. And I don’t mean any of this in a sexist way.

She's smoking hot compared to other female politicians because the others are 80 years old. In the general population she would be a 0.8.

Looks like a fat-headed chihuahua.

She is not vert attractive. Her breasts although natural sit way too low, here iris' are too big, her jaw is too solid like a mans, her smile is that of a horse, she doesnt work out, and worse is her personality....could you imagine dating here...lol she would be so crinchy

She’s got body odor though. Her head is full of garbage.

Small Pond wrote:

Gail Hightower wrote:

I know: what’s my point? Well, I don’t have one. So there.

She's smoking hot compared to other female politicians, but for the population in general, I would give her an 8.

I hate scales like this so much. An 8? What does that make a top tier female actress? A 14? It just leaves no room for describing how much better highly attractive people look.

I prefer something that's more like: 2 = deformed, 3 = more or less ugly, noticably unattractive, 4 = below average, not ugly but clearly lower than average, 5 = average/plain, neither good looking nor bad, 6 = attractive, clearly a good looking guy/or girl, I'd say top 20% maybe fall here, 7 = downright hot, the kind of guy/gal you might see like 1 in 100, that one guy at the party every girl is eying up, 8 = actor/insta model stuff, strikingly good looking, rare to see people like this in everyday life, 9 = absolute top tier, think stuff like Gandy, young brad pitt, etc.

Obviously looks are not completely objective, but they are fairly objective/agreed on. Some people's 9's will be another person 8 or in rare cases 7.

If I had to guess, AOC would be around a 6.5 on my scale. Top 5-10% of looks.

You’re entitled to your own scale, of course, but it seems about one point low, maybe because it ends at nine.

Your scale is strange. You seem to want your own scale since you think it will be more useful. But then why even have a number for the lower tier?

my scale is:

0: bare minimum for me to consider attractive "enough" that I would be interested after a few drinks. About one eighth of people reach 0 or higher.

1: same as above, but no drinks required

2: pretty, girl next door type

3 to 4: well above average, naturally good looking plus takes care of themself

5 to 6: naturally very good looking plus taking very good care of themself

7 to 9: serious beauty standards, the kind of person gracing magazine covers

10: unimagineable

The majority of people just dont make the scale. Why would you waste your time ranking somebody you find irrelevant?

I think about 1/8 people are a 0 or higher on my scale. Next time you are on an airplane, board last. Count how many people you find attractive enough to make the scale. Divide by the number of people on board, you might be surprised how few people in the general population are attractive. There is obviously some selection bias by only looking at people on an airplane, but it's a reasonable approximation for something non critical.

and your point is? wrote:

Your point is? Stalin looked very handsome as a young man, ended up mass murdering in the tens of millions.

First, Stalin didn't kill tens of millions. If you mean Joseph Stalin, when he was faced with surrendering to Hitler or throwing waves of Soviet citizens toward German machine gunners during Battle of Stalingrad until German machine guns jammed or ran out of bullets, you could say he killed millions. Would you say F.D.R. killed 400,000 of his own citizens during WW2?

There were some members of bourgeois and some farmers who owned large plots of land who chose death over the collective good.

In US, those who fail to pay taxes and/or lie on tax returns are incarcerated.

A.O.C. isn't Papa Joe Stalin wrote:

First, Stalin didn't kill tens of millions. If you mean Joseph Stalin, when he was faced with surrendering to Hitler or throwing waves of Soviet citizens toward German machine gunners during Battle of Stalingrad until German machine guns jammed or ran out of bullets, you could say he killed millions. Would you say F.D.R. killed 400,000 of his own citizens during WW2?

You’re a special kind of stupid, aren’t you?

Beat me to it....Pretty clear our education system is failing when this kind of ignorance of History exists. I know it is one example, but I know it probably is more prevalent than not. Jump to college with progressive, neo-Marxist faculty in most Humanities and we get AOC.

and your point is? wrote:

Your point is? Stalin looked very handsome as a young man, ended up mass murdering in the tens of millions.

Yeah. As we all know American female politicians are constantly having their own populace slaughtered on a whim.

Grow up you idiot.

Yep. The only people who would disagree with her beauty are old racist white men who are bizarrely scared of a little Hispanic woman.

Let's see her at work.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRK3FwmjH-Y

L L wrote:

Let's see her at work.

Seems like she knows her stuff.

A real contrast to the moron Republican guy with the "liar liar pants on fire" poster.

She is indeed very beautiful and very smart. Could I imagine dating her? Sure, if I were a lot younger and extremely lucky. There's no reason to fear her or get nervous around her as long as you are respectful and appreciative, as you should be.