I'm a fan of Pippa myself.
I'm a fan of Pippa myself.
Some have way to much time during the holidays.
Royal Commentator. wrote:
It’s not even close. England can have a soft 7 or a hard 9 for their next queen. And Kate seems like nerd, which matches her nerd husband.
If you are going to have a monarchy, at least base it on something meaningful, like looks, rather than a genetic lottery.
Ever heard of the concept that beauty is in the eye of the beholder? Because I would reverse the ratings you gave them. I consider Kate to be undeniably better looking than MM.
Yeah, she seems like a nerd. Im not sure why this was brought up. You think I find party girl diva to be a positive attribute? Nerdy girls tend to he calm and collected in most daily life, which is boring initially, but great long term. In bed, I've found no different long term. Some party girls and nerds are duds in bed, some are great
Royal Commentator. wrote:
It’s not even close. England can have a soft 7 or a hard 9 for their next queen. And Kate seems like nerd, which matches her nerd husband.
If you are going to have a monarchy, at least base it on something meaningful, like looks, rather than a genetic lottery.
Neither of them will be queen.
trollism wrote:
Royal Commentator. wrote:
It’s not even close. England can have a soft 7 or a hard 9 for their next queen. And Kate seems like nerd, which matches her nerd husband.
If you are going to have a monarchy, at least base it on something meaningful, like looks, rather than a genetic lottery.
Neither of them will be queen.
I wish I could be the English president and just get rid of the royal family. They are pointless and waste money. I might run for it some year if I move there. I want to escape Trump.
Banana Bread wrote:
trollism wrote:
Neither of them will be queen.
I wish I could be the English president and just get rid of the royal family. They are pointless and waste money. I might run for it some year if I move there. I want to escape Trump.
Their cost to the tax payer is actually negligible compared to the amount of money they bring in through other methods.
Particularly now many of the younger royals are pretty much worldwide megastars.
I wish I was a megastar. I get bullied here a lot and don't get enough respect. My new year's resolution is to change who I am and try to be different. I want to be better and also run PBs.
Banana Bread wrote:
I wish I could be the English president and just get rid of the royal family. They are pointless and waste money. I might run for it some year if I move there. I want to escape Trump.
Go for it, the position is vacant, although even with no competition you are the sort of guy who doesn't win. In the meanwhile maybe I can try to be the American Prime Minister.
Drainthefecesswamp wrote:
Ever heard of the concept that beauty is in the eye of the beholder? Because I would reverse the ratings you gave them. I consider Kate to be undeniably better looking than MM.
Contradicted yourself in a mere three sentences.
Markle is ½ black, that's why I want her to be queen.
What about William vs Harry? William has some impressive thighs.
Royal Commentator. wrote:...a soft 7 or a hard 9 ...
Gonna have to dig a little deeper than simply evaluating who looks better. If a gal is going to be queen, then you want her to be strong, independent and confident. Therefore, what you should be looking at is whether Megan or Kate is better in the sack. I'll take a "soft 7" who performs like a porn star over a "hard 9" who is strictly a lights-off/missionary type who drops her knickers only for purposes of royal procreation. And you can bet that soft 7 will be getting my hard 9 on a regular basis.
Drainthefecesswamp wrote:
Royal Commentator. wrote:
It’s not even close. England can have a soft 7 or a hard 9 for their next queen. And Kate seems like nerd, which matches her nerd husband.
If you are going to have a monarchy, at least base it on something meaningful, like looks, rather than a genetic lottery.
Ever heard of the concept that beauty is in the eye of the beholder? Because I would reverse the ratings you gave them. I consider Kate to be undeniably better looking than MM.
Yeah, she seems like a nerd. Im not sure why this was brought up. You think I find party girl diva to be a positive attribute? Nerdy girls tend to he calm and collected in most daily life, which is boring initially, but great long term. In bed, I've found no different long term. Some party girls and nerds are duds in bed, some are great
If you can figure out a way for all of us to evaluate them in bed, please let us know!
Meghan is much more attractive than Kate. And Kate is hot.
America needs a hot American queen.
Either would be better than Adam Lambert.
#makequeengreatagain
Team Meghan! wrote:
America needs a hot American queen.
We got one already, Kim Kardashian.
Con Yay wrote:
Team Meghan! wrote:
America needs a hot American queen.
We got one already, Kim Kardashian.
+1
What other country has a Queen that has been peed on? 'Murica!
Megan Markle is "hooker" hot.
That's different, and not as good.
Did you not see the nude photos of Kate when they came out? She has a smoking hot body. Her face is better too. She is way better looking than MM and has a better body.
Rabbi Brojostein wrote:
Agree. Let’s go with the schvarsha.
A. Get out of here with your racist comments
B. MM is equal to Kate in terms of looks. Both very hot. But Pippa is the hottest
Pippa can’t be the queen, so her looks are irrelevant.
I suppose there’s no accounting for bad taste for those who think Kate is hotter, but can we all agree that the royal line of succession should literally be a beauty contest? The royal family has been gross for years, and even Diana’s genes could not overcome Charles, because her kids are mediocre at best.
Let’s get some outside blood in there. Kate is too old school England. Megan all the way!
None of these people are really good looking. You can find much more attractive people anywhere.