Do ANY Vaporfly Carbon Fiber Plate Pictures exist?

This, I don't get.

New iPhone, there are pictures of it broken down within 5 minutes. New, revolutionary shoe? Not a single pic of one deconstructed.

Why take pictures of a single piece of carbon fiber?

There's plenty, youre just not good at googling...

Fantastic! Please indulge us with mere mortal googling skills by posting some then...

But seriously though something is amiss with this - one of the most talked about, controversial things in the sport and yet not one SINGLE picture exists ?

Thank you!

Now that is interesting to finally see shape of the carbon plate.

Two immediately apparent observations:-

1. The shape is as per the released graphics, i.e. the heel is raised, presumably to give the leverage everyone has been talking about?

2. The heel strip is VERY thin and barely, if at all, contoured. Hence the claim that the plate is just there to provide stability would seem to be unsupported by the evidence.

Fly-Curious wrote:

Thank you!

Now that is interesting to finally see shape of the carbon plate.

Two immediately apparent observations:-

1. The shape is as per the released graphics, i.e. the heel is raised, presumably to give the leverage everyone has been talking about?

2. The heel strip is VERY thin and barely, if at all, contoured. Hence the claim that the plate is just there to provide stability would seem to be unsupported by the evidence.

Exactly dude!

Clearly not providing ANY stability whatsoever so your first observation is the ONLY thing it's doing.

The Zoom Flys will injured you.

Cornering stability not inversion / eversion

Fly-Curious wrote:

Thank you!

Now that is interesting to finally see shape of the carbon plate.

Two immediately apparent observations:-

1. The shape is as per the released graphics, i.e. the heel is raised, presumably to give the leverage everyone has been talking about?

2. The heel strip is VERY thin and barely, if at all, contoured. Hence the claim that the plate is just there to provide stability would seem to be unsupported by the evidence.

ZoomFly SP - great training shoe

4% - great racing shoe

ZoomFly - totally sucks

Thankfully I’m not Jamin wrote:

ZoomFly SP - great training shoe

4% - great racing shoe

ZoomFly - totally sucks

What’s the difference between the ZF and the ZF SP?

Thankfully I’m not Jamin wrote:

ZoomFly SP - great training shoe

4% - great racing shoe

ZoomFly - totally sucks

I tried the original ZoomFly. It was awful. Love the 4%. I never went back to the ZoomFly. What's the SP and how does it not suck like the ZoomFly?

I made my own carbon fiber plates and inserted them in a cheap pair of shoes. Total cost of shoes and carbon, about 60 dollars.

The only change between the zoom fly and the zoom fly SP is the upper. It is more of a transparent upper. The lacing structure is also a lot different in the SP's, there is no flywire cables so the SP's use more of a internal cables to keep your foot on the foot bed

Thankfully I’m not Jamin wrote:

ZoomFly SP - great training shoe

4% - great racing shoe

ZoomFly - totally sucks

All comparison of the original Zoom Flys are irrelevant now that the ZF FN it has a CF plate and react foam.