1. I can't stand interviewees who aggressively act like their interviewer is stupid and the questions are beneath them. Wetmore here, Popovich, etc. Grow up, guys. The interviews are part and parcel of the "universe" you inhabit, the same universe that allows you to make a nice living coaching a game. Show some maturity and basic respect for the interviewer just trying to do their job. Blech.
2. Hate for Letsrun by "elite" college and pro athlete and coaches--who are they kidding? THIS IS ALL THERE IS.
Who else cares? Their failing local newspaper? Their parents? American joggers?--the average "mass running" participant at her charity half has NO CLUE who Mark Wetmore is.
When I was a decent college runner over a dozen years ago, the ONLY place my team and I got any publicity apart from our college paper was Letsrun. Hell, you can win a national XC championship, and you MIGHT get a spot in Sports Illustrated's "Faces in the Crowd" section.
The hard truth in the tiny world of competitive running is that everyone knows LRC is where the "action" of people who actually care and are knowledgeable about the sport reside online, but because of the anonymous, often sophomoric nature of the message boards, no one wants to admit it.
Anytime an article in the NY Times mentions "message board chatter" , they're talking about LRC.
If a Sports Illustrated writer wants to learn the scoop--he comes to LRC.
If an article in Outside magazine mentions "online rumors", they're talking about LRC.
LRC has earned the ire of certain players because they've gone after big institutions in our sport--doping, Nike, USATF, etc.
You may not like the two trust fund bros and their terrible spelling, but trust funders can do MUCH worse than start and maintain (for decades now) the only running website on the internet that meaningfully covers the competitive side of the sport. NO ONE ELSE CARES.