She could prolly win state in several states on the guys side.
Let her run v.s. Guys
In fact, get rid of the guys division and create “Open” and “female Only” divisions
Hammer
She could prolly win state in several states on the guys side.
Let her run v.s. Guys
In fact, get rid of the guys division and create “Open” and “female Only” divisions
Hammer
When the libs get their way, there will be no divisions because they actually believe that the genders are equal in every way and that gender is fluid. As good as Tuohy is, she would just be a good male runner and would end up as a D3 runner somewhere unknown. She would only be about the 4th runner on our HS team.
libs are coming wrote:
When the libs get their way, there will be no divisions because they actually believe that the genders are equal in every way and that gender is fluid. As good as Tuohy is, she would just be a good male runner and would end up as a D3 runner somewhere unknown. She would only be about the 4th runner on our HS team.
Can you name a "lib" who wants to do that to sports?
Clinton, Obama, Pelossi, Durban, Winfrey, Goldberg, Streisand, Biden.
Been there done that. Didn’t really work out too well.
Ok here you go wrote:
Clinton, Obama, Pelossi, Durban, Winfrey, Goldberg, Streisand, Biden.
Congrats, you can name a bunch of liberals! Now please provide a link where they said anything remotely suggesting what you claim they want.
G
libs are coming wrote:
When the libs get their way, there will be no divisions because they actually believe that the genders are equal in every way and that gender is fluid.
Super liberal NYer here. All my friends are very left leaning liberal activists.
None of us believe the ‘genders are equal in every way.’ Equal does not mean identical, dumba$$.
As for Tuohy, would be amazing if she could race in a Boys division to see her have some competition.
Ok, latka, then how about we force equality on gender ratios on all sectors including beauty and cosmetics companies. Since we have little representation of dudes in the upper management ranks there, let's just parachute them in. Just like how women b*tch about not being able to pass coding interviews to get into Google, FB, etc.
Wtfbbq wrote:
G
libs are coming wrote:
When the libs get their way, there will be no divisions because they actually believe that the genders are equal in every way and that gender is fluid.
Super liberal NYer here. All my friends are very left leaning liberal activists.
None of us believe the ‘genders are equal in every way.’ Equal does not mean identical, dumba$$.
As for Tuohy, would be amazing if she could race in a Boys division to see her have some competition.
yuugler wrote:
Ok, latka, then how about we force equality on gender ratios on all sectors including beauty and cosmetics companies.
Since we have little representation of dudes in the upper management ranks there, let's just parachute them in. Just like how women b*tch about not being able to pass coding interviews to get into Google, FB etc.
I don’t know what this has to do with Katelyn or her racing however I want to point out that I worked at L’Oreal and have friends who work at Tom Ford Cosmetics, MAC Cosmetics, and Victoria’s Secret.
They have PLENTY of representation of men in upper management there. Hell, I was one and I’m friends with a lot of them.
But yeah, feel free to continue spreading misinformation.
Yes it would be amazing to allow guys to compete in girls sports also.
epicTCK wrote:
She could prolly win state in several states on the guys side.
Let her run v.s. Guys
In fact, get rid of the guys division and create “Open” and “female Only” divisions
Hammer
prolly? seriously?
Touhy is a girl and should run against girls. Guys like German Fernandez and Craig Virgin had no one to challenge them on a local level, but it didn't matter.
libs are coming wrote:
When the libs get their way, there will be no divisions because they actually believe that the genders are equal in every way and that gender is fluid. As good as Tuohy is, she would just be a good male runner and would end up as a D3 runner somewhere unknown. She would only be about the 4th runner on our HS team.
4th on your HS team? How good is your team? Are you expecting to win NXN?
grahamer wrote:
epicTCK wrote:
She could prolly win state in several states on the guys side.
Let her run v.s. Guys
In fact, get rid of the guys division and create “Open” and “female Only” divisions
Hammer
prolly? seriously?
First time on the internet?
You are saying that she could be the 4th runner on LV? Their 4th guy in track ran 9:14 and 4:18. She is nowhere near that. 7th runner was 9:32 and 4:25. She couldn’t even make their top 7.
libs are coming wrote:
She would only be about the 4th runner on our HS team.
It's pretty unlikely that she'd only be #4 on your team.
Tell me what school, so I can straighten you out about this.
Edina.
What ways are the genders not equal? Are women better at anything than men? Should we have an equivalent category for men then?
Edina is the school wrote:
Edina.
Katelyn Tuohy would be #2 on your team, behind Max Manley.
Nice talking to ya. ;-)
Bbjhjhbbhjbhjh wrote:
libs are coming wrote:
When the libs get their way, there will be no divisions because they actually believe that the genders are equal in every way and that gender is fluid. As good as Tuohy is, she would just be a good male runner and would end up as a D3 runner somewhere unknown. She would only be about the 4th runner on our HS team.
4th on your HS team? How good is your team? Are you expecting to win NXN?
You need to get out more. There are plenty of teams where KT would be the 4th man. I coached a state championship team where our top 4 were all under 15:45. KT would have been in the mix to be our last scorer, somewhere in the 5-7 range.