All-Time Time Machine Championship Results - Men's 100m

Put Flo Jo on your stupid mens list

Ben Johnson FTW!!!

Championships have heats.

heat 1

lane

1,Bob Hayes USA

2,Ray Stewart Jamaica

3.Harry Jerome Canada

4.Donovan Bailey Canada

5.Justin Gatlin USA

6.Hasley Crawford Trini

7.Hal Davis Cal

8.John Carlos USA

heat 2

lane

1.Jesse Owens USA

2.Bruny Surin Canada

3.Ato Boldon Trini

4.Tyson Gay USA

5.Mo Greene USA

6.Asafa Powell Jamaica

7.Silvio Leonard Cuba

8.Charlie Greene USA

heat 3

lane

1.Christian Coleman USA

2.Andre DeGrasse Canada

3.Valery Borzov USSR

4.Usain Bolt Jamaica

5.Linford Christie GB

6.Leroy Burrell USA

7.Richard Thompson Trini

8.Steve Williams USA

heat 4

lane

1.Ben Johnson Canada

2.Bobby Morrow ACU

3.Frankie Fredericks Namibia

4.Carl Lewis USA

5.Yohan Blake Jamaica

6.Jim Hines USA

7.Armin Hary WG

8.Tim Montgomery USA

Top four from each heat move into the Semi Finals. PED usuage is cool, yep, a fantasy.

Flo Jo would get waxed in this 100m.

lane

1.Chris Johnson

2.Eric Dickerson

3.Herschel Walker

4.Flo Jo

5.Bo Jackson

6.O.J.Simpson

7.Jamaal Charles

8.Curtis Dickey

Yes they do. I am only posting the results form the final. Also, only three entrants per country.

Ok then....

All Tme 10m Final

lane

1.Bob Hayes USA

2.Linford Christie GB

3.Ben Johnson Canada

4.Usain Bolt Jamaica

5.Justin Gatlin USA

6.Carl Lewis USA

7.Donovan Bailey Canada

8.Yohan Blake Jamaica

Whatley wrote:

Ok then....

All Tme 10m Final

lane

1.Bob Hayes USA

2.Linford Christie GB

3.Ben Johnson Canada

4.Usain Bolt Jamaica

5.Justin Gatlin USA

6.Carl Lewis USA

7.Donovan Bailey Canada

8.Yohan Blake Jamaica

Fail! Lewis can't come close to beating Blake hahhahah. if he even were on team usa, hes only broken 9.92 once over his long career! hahhahaha

How about the All Time 4x1?

lane

1.Cuba....Enrique Figueroa.....Hermes Ramirez....Rafael Fortun....Silvio Leonard

2.Trinidad....Richard Thompson....Ato Boldon....Mike Agostini...Hasley Crawford

3.GB.....Dwain Chambers...Allan Wells...John Regis...Linford Christie

4.USA...Mo Greene...Justin Gatlin...Tyson Gay...Carl Lewis

5.Jamaica....Nesta Carter....Asafa Powell...Yohan Blake....Usain Bolt

6.Canada...Ben Johnson....Andre DeGrasse...Bruny Surin....Donovan Bailey

7.France....Ronold Pognon....Christophe LeMaitre...Roger Bambuck...Jimmy Vicaut

8.Nigeria...Davidson Ezinwa....Olapade Adeniken....Daneil Effiong...Francis Obikwelu

Your premise is faulty.

You are not taking a time machine anywhere.

You are going by what the clock shows and your personal biases.

Take a time machine back to 1936, and none of the guys on your list could beat Jesse Owens with no block, cinder track and heavy shoes.

They would be lucky to break 10.5

Also, most of the runners in your meet have been dinged for doping, so they should be OUT.

formerbosox9yo wrote:

Whatley wrote:

Ok then....

All Tme 10m Final

lane

1.Bob Hayes USA

2.Linford Christie GB

3.Ben Johnson Canada

4.Usain Bolt Jamaica

5.Justin Gatlin USA

6.Carl Lewis USA

7.Donovan Bailey Canada

8.Yohan Blake Jamaica

Fail! Lewis can't come close to beating Blake hahhahah. if he even were on team usa, hes only broken 9.92 once over his long career! hahhahaha

See where it says.......LANE

But......you do get different eras, right? I have no doubts all things being equal Lewis beats Blake,

So what would your All Time 100m look like?

Alternate Reality wrote:

Your premise is faulty.

You are not taking a time machine anywhere.

You are going by what the clock shows and your personal biases.

Take a time machine back to 1936, and none of the guys on your list could beat Jesse Owens with no block, cinder track and heavy shoes.

They would be lucky to break 10.5

Also, most of the runners in your meet have been dinged for doping, so they should be OUT.

He's really gotcha there

I don't agree with that.

Mo Greene didn't run NCAA track, and was injured at KCCC. And his bro Ernest was a 10.2 sprinter. When we first notice Mo he is beating Carl Lewis at the Texas Relays.

I do believe he could have starred in any era. I have no problems seeing him in that 1936 100m mix.

Whatley wrote:

formerbosox9yo wrote:

Fail! Lewis can't come close to beating Blake hahhahah. if he even were on team usa, hes only broken 9.92 once over his long career! hahhahaha

See where it says.......LANE

But......you do get different eras, right? I have no doubts all things being equal Lewis beats Blake,

I dont think you get it. I once held my high school record for SEVEN years, but that doesn't mean I'd ever beat my high schools current #3 guy who never held the record. He is simply better and faster than I ever was. Same goes for Lewis and Blake. Just because one boy is a record holder in one era doesn't mean he c ould even touch some boys from another era.

Then why mess with this time machine thing then?

What were sprinters running in the 80's?

How about the 60's?

The 40's?

And in 2030 these guys today will pale in comparision.

IF............you are serious about a time machine then you are talking if all things were equal, right? If not then dump your "time machine".

Carl Lewis was a better sprinter than Yohan Blake, that's why he accompished more. Do you really think Blake is runnin 9.6 in 1988? You really think Carl Lewis is still running 9.8 in 2018?

People always get way too wrapped up in times when it comes to sprinting. Who has heard of Willie Turner, Oliver Ford, Rey Robinson? All were 100m WR holders.

Sprinting like all sporting events is about accomplishments, honors won vs the best in your era.

No way in hell Jesse Owens is only running a 10.4ish 100m today and no way in hell Christian Coleman is running a 9.8 in the 30's.

We have to consider the realities involved here.

Whatley wrote:

Then why mess with this time machine thing then?

What were sprinters running in the 80's?

How about the 60's?

The 40's?

And in 2030 these guys today will pale in comparision.

IF............you are serious about a time machine then you are talking if all things were equal, right? If not then dump your "time machine".

Carl Lewis was a better sprinter than Yohan Blake, that's why he accompished more. Do you really think Blake is runnin 9.6 in 1988? You really think Carl Lewis is still running 9.8 in 2018?

Lewis only once ran in the 9.8s. If he were time machined here tomorrow, I don't know why he would run any faster than 9.9s. The air isn't any different. Blake would at least get high 9.7s in the 80s if he time machined there tomrrow if he didn't get to take his spikes with him.

Whatley wrote:

People always get way too wrapped up in times when it comes to sprinting. Who has heard of Willie Turner, Oliver Ford, Rey Robinson? All were 100m WR holders.

Sprinting like all sporting events is about accomplishments, honors won vs the best in your era.

No way in hell Jesse Owens is only running a 10.4ish 100m today and no way in hell Christian Coleman is running a 9.8 in the 30's.

We have to consider the realities involved here.

World records are overrated. The 60s Boston Celtics were also a dominant world records setting team, but it doesn't mean they would beat the 2018 Utah Jazz.

I dont think anyone in their right might would think Coleman would run 9.8 in the 30s on a dirt track. It doesn't me he couldn't run 10.4 though.

formerbosox9yo wrote:

Whatley wrote:

Then why mess with this time machine thing then?

What were sprinters running in the 80's?

How about the 60's?

The 40's?

And in 2030 these guys today will pale in comparision.

IF............you are serious about a time machine then you are talking if all things were equal, right? If not then dump your "time machine".

Carl Lewis was a better sprinter than Yohan Blake, that's why he accompished more. Do you really think Blake is runnin 9.6 in 1988? You really think Carl Lewis is still running 9.8 in 2018?

Lewis only once ran in the 9.8s. If he were time machined here tomorrow, I don't know why he would run any faster than 9.9s. The air isn't any different. Blake would at least get high 9.7s in the 80s if he time machined there tomrrow if he didn't get to take his spikes with him.

You aren't getting this at all.

Carl Lewis was the dominant sprinter in his day. And one of the all time greats. He was world ranked number one how many times? You are way too caught up with times. Which pales in comparision to what these sprinters did vs their competition.

Jim Brown is STILL considered the best RB (actually a FB) ever, why? Yep....................dominance of era. Obviously he's nor running overe these guys today or awat fron 4.4 DB's, But........it simply doesn't matter.

You aren't getting what a time machine means.