Alex Jones CENSORED by the communist social media

DiscoGary wrote:

Let me guess. You think hate speech should be silenced right?

You are still a man child. You must have grown up in a white incubator. I'm aware that it is deeply painful for you to accept that we are not down with things like pedophilia and racist genocide. Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences. We are not the ones calling for murder of journos, blacks, Jews, Mexicans, Muslims. etc. Go ahead and spew your sh*t, but a privately owned social platform does not have to carry you. Capitalism means people vote with their feet. If you don't like what youtube, etc. did, then don't frequent their platform.

DiscoGary wrote:

idiot alert wrote:

Why the hell would you defend violent bigots and racists?

I don't defend violence, unless it's in self defense. If we take away rights from people we don't like, what's to stop others from taking away our rights when the Thought Police decide they don't like us?

Though police? Who are the thought police?

Are they the 43% of Republicans who think Trump should have the power to shut down media he disagrees with?

And this jackboot thing again: Back when Elian was hiding in the closet, all the right wingers I knew adopted the "jackboot" term. Now we've got a guy leading this country who calls Nazis "fine people." Can you explain the difference here?

I’m fine with this as long as Apple gets rid of Sam Harris too. He’s been disparaging my religion for years, as well as trying to instigate groups to demand its dissolution across the country. He better go next. Harris is truly scary. Jones is a buffoon.

Is anyone on the Left even slightly concerned that this push to blacklist free speech may some day end up blacklisting what they have to say?

DiscoGary wrote:

Is anyone on the Left even slightly concerned that this push to blacklist free speech may some day end up blacklisting what they have to say?

Do you think that a baker should be forced to create gay wedding cakes? Does it concern you in the least that the baker as a private business has the right to choose if they want to create gay wedding cakes or not?

Sam Harris is Next wrote:

I’m fine with this as long as Apple gets rid of Sam Harris too. He’s been disparaging my religion for years, as well as trying to instigate groups to demand its dissolution across the country. He better go next. Harris is truly scary. Jones is a buffoon.

OK, I'll bite... when has Sam Harris tried to instigate groups to demand the dissolution of your religion?

DiscoGary wrote:

idiot alert wrote:

Why the hell would you defend violent bigots and racists?

I don't defend violence, unless it's in self defense. If we take away rights from people we don't like, what's to stop others from taking away our rights when the Thought Police decide they don't like us?

Reading is fundamental. You are defending violent bigots and racists.

Fatboy, does he have to actually verbalize the words to incite crazy leftist fringe sjws ?

idiot alert wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

Why the hell would we defend law breakers?

Why the hell would you defend violent bigots and racists?

+1 why doesn't the right ever have to defend itself? You just get to cite the 1st amendment and then not have to dig any deeper. What good is it to have a person who denies Sandy Hook running around spewing incorrect information? Do you see nothing wrong with letting white supremacists do/say whatever they want? Okay so speech is speech, they can say and do awful things, let's hope they all keep getting punched. Knock them all out. What is your proposal to stopping their ideas from spreading?

And getting back to the question at hand, social media platforms have the right to control their own content. They have the right to be rid of this clown. He can yell all he wants from whatever garbage platform he can get on, but he has to find one that will host him first.

fatbody wrote:

Sam Harris is Next wrote:

I’m fine with this as long as Apple gets rid of Sam Harris too. He’s been disparaging my religion for years, as well as trying to instigate groups to demand its dissolution across the country. He better go next. Harris is truly scary. Jones is a buffoon.

OK, I'll bite... when has Sam Harris tried to instigate groups to demand the dissolution of your religion?

I listen to Harris when I run sometimes, and there was an episode when he had Dawkins with him. A live show. I felt uncomfortable listening to that episode, especially because it was live and the crowd seemed provoked. It hate a hate speech element to it. I think Harris is a smart man and has some really interesting things to say, so I wish he'd leave the anti-religion stuff out of his podcasts.

RunnerCast wrote:

I listen to Harris when I run sometimes, and there was an episode when he had Dawkins with him. A live show. I felt uncomfortable listening to that episode, especially because it was live and the crowd seemed provoked. It hate a hate speech element to it. I think Harris is a smart man and has some really interesting things to say, so I wish he'd leave the anti-religion stuff out of his podcasts.

I honestly can't figure out why anybody thinks Harris is a smart man. I mean he is OK as far as being an entertaining podcaster, but I don't really see any deep thoughts in there.

Again you guys continue to lump violent actions in with free speech. In Charlottesville, the Nazis were not violent. They were attacked by Democrats and then after the rally one of them went nuts.

The best way stop their ideas from spreading is to stop beating them up when they speak because when you do, you make them the victims! Duh. If you leave them alone, they are nothing but a couple dozen losers carrying torches and everyone will ignore them. If you attack them, you force me to defend them and I will do so to the death.

At this point I would like to call for a timeout so that the coach of the Liberal team can replace the current Liberals on field with smarter ones. Who's on the bench over there who can think more than one move ahead? This is getting tedious.

Good job doubling down on the lying, Gary.

The Nazis in Charlottesville extensively planned violence prior to their rallies, then they acted on it. Those discussions included plowing into protestors with cars.

What do we need to do to stop your disgusting speech? Knock you out? What is your proposal to stop your vile ideas from spreading? All you do is stir sht up cuz everything bothers your fragile self.

Planning violence vs. Planning FOR violence. Big difference.

They were planning FOR violence because they knew Dems WERE planning violence and would show up and try to beat them up and that the police probably wouldn't help them. That had happened at other rallies before, including some Trump rallies. They were right. They were attacked and police did not protect them. I am shocked they didn't kill anyone outright in the first melee. They exercised a tremendous amount of discipline. If you continue to deny people their rights, then eventually people will get killed.

Is there any Liberal out there who understands that you can't just go around punching people who say things you don't like? Were any of you taught basic civil rights? Ugh! Could I PLEASE have a more sophisticated Liberal!?

DiscoGary wrote:

Is anyone on the Left even slightly concerned that this push to blacklist free speech may some day end up blacklisting what they have to say?

I do not view this as a push to blacklist free speech and so no this doesn't not change my level of concern of someday being blacklisted.

local lib wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

Is anyone on the Left even slightly concerned that this push to blacklist free speech may some day end up blacklisting what they have to say?

I do not view this as a push to blacklist free speech and so no this doesn't not change my level of concern of someday being blacklisted.

So you aren't afraid that one day the things you think fall under "free speech" may someday fall under "hate speech" and get blacklisted? What about all the hate on this site aimed at me? Is that free speech or hate speech?

DG, give it a rest. I was a newspaper guy for more than a dozen years, I understand free speech, censorship, and the first amendment very well. The second, too. I had a camera, and had people shooting at me. I get all that.

The topic here is a carnival barker who's gone too far. The towns won't let him park his trailer at the fairgrounds any more. Jones can continue to host his videos at a million other places. My servers, included. There's no censorship here, this is the invisible hand of the free market the Republicans love so much, until it pushes them out of the way.

Jones is about to be ground into dust thanks to his inflammatory comments, and these companies fleeing from him are simply covering their butts, as business are allowed to do. I agree there are lots of other idiots posting videos on YouTube. Personally, I avoid them by NOT PLAYING THEM.

DiscoGary wrote:

local lib wrote:

I do not view this as a push to blacklist free speech and so no this doesn't not change my level of concern of someday being blacklisted.

So you aren't afraid that one day the things you think fall under "free speech" may someday fall under "hate speech" and get blacklisted? What about all the hate on this site aimed at me? Is that free speech or hate speech?

I'm not any more afraid of my free speech being compromised today than I was a week ago, before some companies decided to block InfoWars accounts. I don't see Jones' freedom of speech being compromised here, either.