Clayton Murphy's progression is OBJECTIVELY as suspicious as Ramzi's. In two years Ramzi went from 3:45 to 3:30 which is a 6.6 percent improvement. Clayton improved from 1:50 to 1:42.9 which is 6.5 percent. A guy who ran 1:56, 1:54, 1:50 suddenly jumps to 1:45 and then 1:42 is not suspicious to many on here at all.
It's as bad as Amos and it's worse if you consider Murphy went from 1:54 average high school times to 1:42 in 3 years. And you like to point out drop offs as evidence of short term doping, Murphy dropped off the face of the earth and went back to running crappy times since 2016.
My point is people on this site come up with other reasons as to why Murphy improved so much, other than doping. You yourself just stated 'he improved all his other distances too' as some sort of qualifier as to why his improvement is clean.
But if Clayton Murphy was not a white American, I don't believe for a second that everyone wouldn't put his improvement down to drugs and drugs alone. There wouldn't even be another sentence in the discussion. Even Korir who lives and trains in America but is African born and only improved from 1:46.9 to 1:43 is apparently more suspect than Murphy.
One set of rules for some and another set of rules for others. Just like I said.
I also need to qualify that I don't think Murphy was doping because people on this site are stupid and consistently misinterpret my posts.