So it looks like Science now studies that we might be the only so-called intelligent life out there, in observable universe

But it's probably too far away to find, communicate with, and definitely too far away to get to. I'm not sure we would want to find them if they're smarter than us. Maybe they can tell us how to cure cancer at least.

Of course because we actually live in a geocentric model. The heliocentric model is a lie. Earth is flat. Look up Eric Dubay.

Concluding that we are the only advanced civilization surely involves the same amount of guesswork on the same uncertain parameters.

A responsible scientist should admit that there's no compelling case for one or the other, and not clickbait the world for a quick buck.

Like saying we are responsible for global warming, calling us an intelligent life form is giving us way too much credit.

Would somebody on another planet in another galaxy be able to receive radio waves and other such signs of life on Earth if they were trying to find life somewhere in the Milky Way Galaxy?

full frontal wrote:

Would somebody on another planet in another galaxy be able to receive radio waves and other such signs of life on Earth if they were trying to find life somewhere in the Milky Way Galaxy?

They are watching youtube laughing at us

Judging from the people on this forum, an unbiased scientist might question whether humans rightfully constitute an intelligent life form.

Regardless of whether there's other intelligent life (which I actually consider likely--given that there are more stars in the known universe than there are grains of sand on all the beaches of Earth), the odds are extraordinarily slim that the species H. sapiens sapiens will ever encounter it.

The speed of light is a pretty daunting speed limit. Other stars are really, really far away.

We are the only life forms. If there were otheres, it would be like star trek 2 billion years ago with more advanced life forms everywhere much less now.

Distance wouldn’t be a problem cause they would have had billions of years head start on us to figure it out. Hell humans will figure it out in a couple hundred years max!

Why are we the only life forms, who the F knows!!!! But we are fellow humans.

Ummmm.... ever here of AI?????

AI is what will change EVERYTHING. If humans can create AI in less than 200 thousand years , then other civilizations would have as well with BILLIONS of years head start on us. BUT they haven't or you would see them everywhere. The Fermi Paradox explains this very well.

And we are only less than 20 years away from AI. Hold on fast, and watch everything change, good or bad....

Sand Dunes wrote:

Of course because we actually live in a geocentric model. The heliocentric model is a lie. Earth is flat. Look up Eric Dubay.

Eric Dubai - Blahahahaaaaa!

The existence of organic life form on other planets is a greater possibility than any interaction among them.

Bad Wigins wrote:

Concluding that we are the only advanced civilization surely involves the same amount of guesswork on the same uncertain parameters.

A responsible scientist should admit that there's no compelling case for one or the other, and not clickbait the world for a quick buck.

In 1491 there was no new world left to discover. The only people across the Atlantic were people in Asia.

full frontal wrote:

Would somebody on another planet in another galaxy be able to receive radio waves and other such signs of life on Earth if they were trying to find life somewhere in the Milky Way Galaxy?

We’ve been broadcasting radio waves for about 100 years. That means the farthest our footprint has traveled is 100 light years. There are only 511 stars within 100 light years of earth and of those 511 it is estimated that only 28 have planets.

So, no, it is quite unlikely that any exoplanets have knowledge of our existence.

Chances are not looking good, says Oxford wrote:

If intelligent life is so likely to exist elsewhere in the universe, why haven’t we found it?

You might not be aware, but the universe if pretty fukin big.

Humans and other relatively sentient life forms on planet earth are walking bags of bacteria. We allow bacteria to grow, thrive and mutate. Our entire digestive process that allows us to live is based on so called "good" bacteria in our bodies breaking down the foods we eat. Bacteria crashed on earth from space debris that may have traveled through space over billions of years and across vast distances. We are remnants of extraterrestrial life. The debris from which we mutated was spread throughout the known and unknown universe. We are not alone.

Then WHY is there NOTHING we can see or hear. Earth is not an old planet. Meaning, that other planets have billions of years head start on us and I believe that within a couple of hundred years, much less a thousand or two, humans will be able to travel throughout the milkway imo. AI will allow us to rapidly progress space travel and technology faster than ever before.

For arguments sake, let's say it takes 10,000 years for humans to figure out space travel, that isn't the BILLIONS of years that trillions of other planets had the chance to do what humans I believe will be able to do in a much much much shorter time. And if you think we are the smartest cookies, gosh.

So WHERE ARE THEY!!

Even if 99% of them are peaceful and dont want to F with us, you know there would be one or two Byches that would.

So everyone who says they are out there, then they would be out there. Like EVERYWHERE. People are dense....

Bad Wigins wrote:

Concluding that we are the only advanced civilization surely involves the same amount of guesswork on the same uncertain parameters.

A responsible scientist should admit that there's no compelling case for one or the other, and not clickbait the world for a quick buck.

The fact that Bad Wigins responded with a 100% serious post instead of a joke shows how stupid this paper is.