Biological boys go 1-2 at girls state finals in Connecticut... awkward finish (video)

There are only 2 genders. If you believe otherwise there are more you need some help. Transgenders needs help for their mental illness

WHEN will people startvstabdingbup for what is right and quit accepting what the crazies want to push as the new normal?

GIRLS ! If the meet director allows a boy to compete in your event, WALK OFF THE TRACK.

If all of you will do that, and do it EVERY TIME, the farce will soon end.

Get together on the track after the last running event and do your event for fun, girls only.

Drastic situations call for drastic measures.

Just do it.

social, not biological wrote:

"Biological boy" is a nonsense phrase. Gender is a social construct, not a biological thing.

Well gender is a word and a social construct but what isn't a social construct is whether someone has a penis or not and whether they have tons of testosterone. Let them call themselves whatever they want, boy, girl, human, earth being, etc. but anyone with a brain should understand they shouldn't be allowed to compete against the girls in athletic competition.

Here's a question for you. At NCAAs next year when the men go on day 1, and the women on day 2. Should Vincent Kiprop be allowed to win the NCAA men's title on day 1, then self-identify as a woman on day 2 and win that as well?

The fact that we are even entertaining ANYTHING about this nonsense of putting boys in womens divisions proves this country is an embarrassment. This already has gone too far. We are all a bunch of pushovers in this country,, and we deserve to be invaded and colonized. Theres no excuse for this bulllsht. We have a weak weak nation.

And nothing will be done about this issue.. Mark my words....NOTHING.

NOTHING WILL CHANGE IT. The degenerates have won because we are a total p*sssy country who's afraid to stand up to scum.

You don't get to chose your gender even in 2018. I wish I could "feel like man" and thus be endowed... I believe they should be able to run, how about in there OWN race not Co-Op the BIOLOGICAL Girls .

If this continues there won't be any BIOLOGICAL GIRLS left in the GIRL RACE

Ahhh... NO these people THAT MADE A DECISION FOR NON BIOLOGICAL GIRLS are Discriminating against the BIOLOGICAL Girls in favor of NON Biological "Girls". The problem is competing. THEY need there OWN LANE. How about their own heat.. Stay in your lane. I don't care what you call it but FAIR ISN'T IT. THESE NON BIOLOGICAL GIRLS HAVE NATURAL TESTOSTERONE.

A clearly biased unfair playing ground.

BTW have you noticed the few incidents of this kind of race thus far ,the times are so slow in general that only these Non Bio Girls (boys) can win a slow girl RACE.... REALLY not one SLIGHTLY ABOVE average BIO Boy yet. When that happens then what ?

The moment an AVERAGE STATE CONTENDER(10.6) high school BIO- boy jumps into race it will invite 7 more and then...

Well, it will be time to have a Girls race again .

Cut to the chase they need to get their own heat. Let the girls run with BIOLOGICAL Girls.

*Don't bother calling me names that doesn't apply to me.

I am a female, non white and have gay people in my family more than one, that I love.

Whats love got to do with the sport and girls and boys competing fairly with each other not Feeling Like another gender..Nothing... Nothing at all.

rojo wrote:

social, not biological wrote:

"Biological boy" is a nonsense phrase. Gender is a social construct, not a biological thing.

Well gender is a word and a social construct but what isn't a social construct is whether someone has a penis or not and whether they have tons of testosterone. Let them call themselves whatever they want, boy, girl, human, earth being, etc. but anyone with a brain should understand they shouldn't be allowed to compete against the girls in athletic competition.

Here's a question for you. At NCAAs next year when the men go on day 1, and the women on day 2. Should Vincent Kiprop be allowed to win the NCAA men's title on day 1, then self-identify as a woman on day 2 and win that as well?

See , the fact that you're arguing with crazy is insane in itself. These people need to be btch slapped back into the closet , but as a society we wont do it. Youre probably afraid to lose sponsors. You could make huge headlines ripping the LGBT "movement" on this very web site. You could be alternative news. But you're scared. I understand that. This is why NOTHING will get done.

And we won't protect our females in this country. I can't call it any other way, we are a weak country.

LetsEatDoughnutsInstead wrote:

This thread showcases some pretty horrible people.

Can we just meet in the middle and say three things:

1) It's not fair for young women to compete against someone who is genetically male

2) It's not fair to discriminate against someone who self identifies as a different gender. Obviously millions of people around the world who self identify as a different gender aren't making up their feelings, so they shouldn't be ostracized. I'm not sure what the solution is for their placement in sports competitions.

3) My God - DiscoGary is a horrible person and off the deep end.

Is saying that a human being with, presumably, male anatomy and physiology, who identifies as female, should not be allowed to use a female-only locker room or female-only bathroom wrongfully discriminatory?

Is it wrongfully discriminatory to refuse to address Caitlyn Jenner with female pronouns or as a woman? If I conformed to such a protocol, I would believe that I were lying. If I were forced to do so, I would feel that I were the one being discriminated against. May God bless Bruce Jenner even more, but he's very confused. I don't want to be complicit in confusing him by "accepting" him as a woman or praising him for his courage in his struggle.

The world record for women in the mile is 4:12. What happens when a boy-girl in CT breaks the world record? People will pay attention.

I use to race cyclocross against a guy who identified as a woman but raced as a male. He/she was very good and a great competitor. He/she could have easily raced and dominated in the womans field but didnt.

He/she had class and ethics.

rojo wrote:

social, not biological wrote:

"Biological boy" is a nonsense phrase. Gender is a social construct, not a biological thing.

Well gender is a word and a social construct but what isn't a social construct is whether someone has a penis or not and whether they have tons of testosterone. Let them call themselves whatever they want, boy, girl, human, earth being, etc. but anyone with a brain should understand they shouldn't be allowed to compete against the girls in athletic competition.

Here's a question for you. At NCAAs next year when the men go on day 1, and the women on day 2. Should Vincent Kiprop be allowed to win the NCAA men's title on day 1, then self-identify as a woman on day 2 and win that as well?

Kiprop would have to qualify for nationals first and would not be able to do so as both a man and a woman. So no, it should not and would not be allowed.

If someone wants to bring attention to this it could be done very easily. Are there any collegiate men that could win the 100, 400, 1500 and 10000 on the women's side, setting NCAA records in all four events?

THe link to the Youtube video with Serena saying she has no desire to play a man was great. ALong those lines, it already happened.

I 100% agree but clearly not everyone agrees with you as we just had these two people go 1-2 in Connecticut. I can't believe this is happening. What is the reaction in the local community? I can't believe some people aren't protesting, walking off the track, etc.

DiscoGary wrote:

They present a boy who says he's a girl. You must also say he's a girl or you are called a transphobia bigot. This is straight out of Orwell's 1984. Accept the lie or suffer. They rule through terror.

When they can force you to accept their illusion as your reality, then they utterly control you and can force you to accept ANYTHING, no matter how much damage it does to society.

This needs to stop here and now. This is the hill to die on. If we lose this, we lose reality and will be forced to accept whatever Hell on Earth SJWs say we deserve. It is time for good people to stand up and fight.

I get your point and mostly agree.

I don’t think people/kids that identify as girls but are not girls should be competing with girls. I’m okay if they race together but they get separate medals and it does not count as a girl’s record.

I’m fine if you are born not a girl but you identify as a girl because I don’t care and it doesn’t affect my life at all. What people choose to do is mostly none of my business. However, I think it’s a little effed up when someone like Melissa Bishop is robbed of a medal.

Shes on first he's on 2nd, I dont know yet is on third base.

Dromano19 wrote:

ProudSnowflake wrote:

I would be proud and supportive of the child and help them in their lives.

While the child is struggling to make it up stairs you’ll chide him for not being good enough of a walker and them get upset when the child wants fair treatment.

But his struggles are not good enough for you, you’ll just vote in more republicans to cut funding to build wheelchair ramps and prevent him from getting access to healthcare. And while he cannot make it up the stairs you’ll say he’s not contributing enough to society and want him fired.

You had me trolled at first too. 8/10

The handle automatically gave it away to me, but he's been getting so many legitimate responses from his trolling that I have to agree with the rating. 8/10

As a girl I would be pissed. Girls and boys are not the same that is why there are two divisions. Everyone gets mad when I say this but it’s true and you will know this more then anything through running. Just because you claim to be a girl does not mean you have her body. You should go where you are biologically from. I qualified for states and still about every guy on my team can beat me. It’s not fair and no matter how hard they work those guys will beat them.

polarbear wrote:

If you have testes, if you were declared a male at birth, then you run as a male, unless you do hormone therapy to a reasonable threshold to eliminate any advantage.

That is the ugly slippery slope that you risk tumbling down when you accept the idea of gender choices. You are going to be condoning dangerous and uncertain therapies and surgeries in order to accommodate and thus exacerbate what might otherwise be a relatively mild mental illness (or desire for eccentric "sexual" pleasures). Thus you render this possibly transitory illness a permanent trauma.

If you can identify as particular gender, can you also identify as a particular age?

In the next cross country season, could twenty-five year old male identify himself as a twelve year old and compete in that age range? Of even as a twelve year old girl? The possibilities are mind blowing.

Are they allowed to use the same showers as all the others in the competition?

If not that is indicative that they should not compete with them.

Simple mind wrote:

Are they allowed to use the same showers as all the others in the competition?

If not that is indicative that they should not compete with them.

I believe it is not that simple.

I think we need to find a way for them to compete and participate in sports like every other child. It would be very harmful for someone who feels and looks and thinks of themselves as a girl to work out every day with a group of kids who are the opposite sex (at least on some levels). We need to find a way that they could participate with those of their kind. And girls are more of their kind than are the boys. We just need to find a way to let them do that but not cheat or disadvantage the biological girls. And i think it could be done as i explained previously, by letting them compete but not post season (regionals, nationals, etc.)