IS the championship a 5, 8 or 10, K. I run 5ks sometimes but never heard of a 8k
IS the championship a 5, 8 or 10, K. I run 5ks sometimes but never heard of a 8k
XC IS FUN wrote:
IS the championship a 5, 8 or 10, K. I run 5ks sometimes but never heard of a 8k
the NCAA DIII national championship is an 8k for men, 6k for women
DQ harassment report #69 wrote:
Wartburg Xc wrote:
Wartburg should be considered a threat to North Central. Sam Pinkowski is definitely a title favorite and they have a few others who can compete for all-american
Pinkowski looks like a REAL title favorite coming in 26th at Pre-Nats, and Wartburg was only 273 points away from North Central! Can't wait to watch that gap magically disappear come Nationals!
dude, why did you go back to dig this up lmao did wartburg deny your acceptance letter or something and youre still salty?
Nah it can't be that. To get accepted at Wartburg you just need to be able to spell your name.
It's crazy how one dude at Flotrack spending 30 minutes on D3 every week can produce rankings that have significantly lower week-over-week variance (and seemingly, better accuracy) than a poll of several D3 coaches.
For example, LAX down to 5th after beating WashU 2 weeks ago? How does that make any sense? And nobody really expects LAX to finish 5th at nationals anyways... they are good this year and consistently podium. Calvin? Ehhhhh
observer of rankings wrote:
It's crazy how one dude at Flotrack spending 30 minutes on D3 every week can produce rankings that have significantly lower week-over-week variance (and seemingly, better accuracy) than a poll of several D3 coaches.
For example, LAX down to 5th after beating WashU 2 weeks ago? How does that make any sense? And nobody really expects LAX to finish 5th at nationals anyways... they are good this year and consistently podium. Calvin? Ehhhhh
Two things:
1. Coaches voting like get protective of their region, or at least over-estimate the strength of their region, when voting. So their is bias involved.
2. One flotrack guy can stick to his bias opinion much longer than he wants. So less flucuation can be the not admit to "being wrong" fallicy...like keeping that crappy guy on your fantasy football roster because you drafted him, even if he's not producing.
3. Is LAX better than Wash U.? Wash U. can definitely better. Some teams come into the season and get race ready sooner, others put more of a base in and under-perform while getting ready for a late season surge.
Will NCC '18 break the '93 team's low point score?
If they had Borowsky this year.
I wonder which team will have the best tempo come natty's
Dan Mayer wrote:
Will NCC '18 break the '93 team's low point score?
no
Dude? You can get into North Central with a 16 ACT. We're here to talk running, right? Not academic standards.
Storm4orce wrote:
Dude? You can get into North Central with a 16 ACT. We're here to talk running, right? Not academic standards.
Do you have proof of this? I'd be highly curious since online it shows their range as 22-27.
22 is their 25% so they 25% of their acceptances score less than that
"37 percent of first-year students are considered first-generation—neither parent graduated from college"
I wonder if that has something to do with the average ACT? Not that ACT remotely matters in terms of determining collegiate academic success
attempting the knock them down for academics because you are insecure you’d be 20th man on their team huh?
Find another website if you wanna talk about academics
I didn’t come to NCC to play school
can someone explain to me why Pomona-Pitzer is still ranked in the top 10?
east coast bias wrote:
can someone explain to me why Pomona-Pitzer is still ranked in the top 10?
ITS BECAUSE OF THE LIBS
LOCK HER UP
Mideast thread deleted?