Better than Broward cowards, Illinois High School Resource Officer SHOOTS DOWN Alleged Armed Gunman Attacker

And conservatives all over celebrate a teenager being shot by a cop.

That is a real hero. Clearly prevented a tragedy, but will be buried in the news. Can't get headlines for students that didn't get shot.

recurring theme wrote:

And conservatives all over celebrate a teenager being shot by a cop.

Absolutely. As everyone should in this situation.

Jdjdjdjdjd wrote:

recurring theme wrote:

And conservatives all over celebrate a teenager being shot by a cop.

Absolutely. As everyone should in this situation.

You're glad that this event occurred?

recurring theme wrote:

And conservatives all over celebrate a teenager being shot by a cop.

Meanwhile, libs are "SAD!" the statutory Police Resource Officer stepped up with government-allocated service weapon and saved 19 or lives, depriving them of another month of NRA hectoring over whimsical "gun-control" ideology.

Yep, your narrative sucks too wrote:

recurring theme wrote:

And conservatives all over celebrate a teenager being shot by a cop.

Meanwhile, libs are "SAD!" the statutory Police Resource Officer stepped up with government-allocated service weapon and saved 19 or lives, depriving them of another month of NRA hectoring over whimsical "gun-control" ideology.

One out of 10 successes doesn’t quite justify the celebration.

But in this case, he is a hero.

Great job on his part. You need those with guns to be trained officers. Even those often aren't able to do it, as at Parkland.

But much better than spending millions fruitlessly throughout the land to put guns in the hands of lots of untrained teachers as an alternative to actually cracking down on supply and access to guns and ammunition.

Hard to type while someone's telling you about a much worse incident, but what I meant to say was that it would be better to cut down on access to high-powered guns and ammunition, especially to the young and the crazy.

recurring theme wrote:

Jdjdjdjdjd wrote:

Absolutely. As everyone should in this situation.

You're glad that this event occurred?

Yes, we're all glad that this event occurred instead of the event that was originally planned. Aren't you?

where the students were gathered for graduation practice, at around 8 a.m.

Wow, if I was in HS I wouldn't get up that early for graduation practice.

everything went right in this case, when a whole lot of things could have gone wrong ... one thing has to happen before anything can go right — the shooter has to be confronted with deadly force. Mass shooters don’t pick schools as targets because they want to engage in an equal fight; they choose schools because they believe them to be soft targets without the ability to engage in return. They want easy targets, not a gun battle, because they are cowards.

With this as the key of any defense of any perceived soft targets, it’s clear why having armed and trained personnel on hand makes more sense than declaring areas “gun-free zones” and forbidding it. In this case, a school resource officer was on hand, but a teacher who’s willing to carry and take the extra training necessary for the task should be allowed to participate in effective defense and self-defense, too. That would assure an even faster confrontation with cowards who want to confront only defenseless children and staff and limit even further the damage they can cause.

Good times are killing me wrote:

recurring theme wrote:

You're glad that this event occurred?

Yes, we're all glad that this event occurred instead of the event that was originally planned. Aren't you?

I'd rather nothing happen at all. I'd rather not have a kid showing up with a gun in the first place. You wouldn't?

recurring theme wrote:

I'd rather nothing happen at all. I'd rather not have a kid showing up with a gun in the first place. You wouldn't?

I'm hiring for a fairy-tale writer.

recurring theme wrote:

Good times are killing me wrote:

Yes, we're all glad that this event occurred instead of the event that was originally planned. Aren't you?

I'd rather nothing happen at all. I'd rather not have a kid showing up with a gun in the first place. You wouldn't?

If my aunt had balls she's be my uncle.

Take a break from reality wrote:

recurring theme wrote:

I'd rather nothing happen at all. I'd rather not have a kid showing up with a gun in the first place. You wouldn't?

I'm hiring for a fairy-tale writer.

Yep, rather than actually deal with the problem at hand, let's instead imagine how much better the world would if it simply didn't exist in the first place!, which in the next instance could be indeed true if only all the evil greedy people would give up control of their lives to people like me, and we'd all live happily ever after (especially me).

Yep, your narrative sucks too wrote:

Meanwhile, libs are "SAD!" the statutory Police Resource Officer stepped up with government-allocated service weapon and saved 19 or lives, depriving them of another month of NRA hectoring over whimsical "gun-control" ideology.

It's almost like in its on cue....

Just when Trump (USA) has good-news momentum, they (Antifa, etc) send a deranged shooter into a "gun-free" zone and then trying to campaign (midterms) against NRA from the "incidental damage" they cause. How many must die, before ALL schools get the picture like Illinois Dixon did?

Take a break from reality wrote:

recurring theme wrote:

I'd rather nothing happen at all. I'd rather not have a kid showing up with a gun in the first place. You wouldn't?

I'm hiring for a fairy-tale writer.

So it's only in the land of fairy tales where kids getting slaughtered in schools isn't a regular event?

Tell that to most of the rest of the world.

trollism wrote:

So it's only in the land of fairy tales where kids getting slaughtered in schools isn't a regular event?

Tell that to most of the rest of the world.