Jsjsj wrote:
I believe Kiprop told a fairly accurate version of events. Which is why he came out with it so quickly. He omitted the fact that he doped though.
Here is how I see it going down:
Kiprop KNOWS the people from previous dealings (he said that himself). No reason for guys who were previously straight and narrow to all of a sudden turn on you unless they were never straight.
So I see it like — the guys knew he doped.
They called him the day before to make sure he would have the money.
He says yes come by.
When they get there, they ask for more money than agreed upon this time for whatever reason and Kiprop disagrees. Maybe an argument.
In fact, Kiprop probably told him that was all he had. In which they told him to go get whatever cash he had in the house — otherwise, they would have just asked him to wire more.
So, he gets the cash or says he doesn’t have any and they simply seal his actual sample.
So, he’s telling the truth about one thing: he tested positive because he didn’t pay enough money, but he was paying to erase dirt, not prevent dirt from being added.
FWIW: think of this way, what is more likely? A dirty testing agent goes rogue and shakes down innocent people for fear of spiking ? Or that he works with dopers and replaces samples.
Clearly, there would be 100s of whistleblowers if innocent people were getting shook down and they would all come to Kiprop’s defense now.