We already know that these lab tests were not lab test results as such, but really a personal Excel spreadsheet by an IAAF delegate. I'm scratching my head wondering what "WADA still stands by the likely doping report" is even supposed to mean. The WADA-IC completely rejected any and all arguments based on blood values between 2001-2008, and the WADA-IC supported the IAAF in the way it followed up on abnormal values. Post ABP, after 2009, the WADA-IC called the IAAF the ABP poster-boy for other ADOs. No individual athletes were sanctioned as a result of any "likely doping report". So what was the impact of WADA "standing by" an incomplete spreadsheet, for athletes like Paula?
Lab Tests wrote:
rekrunner wrote:
What report did WADA stand by?
The Lab tests leaked to ARD ?