and we have learned... wrote:
markschultz40 wrote:
How do you factor in people who experience huge spikes in improvements once they start taking running more seriously in college?
Say he's 9:40 now, but gets in some heavy volume and has the talent to run sub 9 at the end of his freshman year of college.
That would justify the scholarship. Do athletic programs take into account current training vs future training potential?
If I were a coach at Harvard and had a scholarship spot, I'd take the chance with a 9:40 guy if there was that one spot remaining, especially if he is only running 40 or less miles per week now.
... mark knows nothing about Ivies.
I went to a state school and I'm is making $89K/yr. No need to.