Which is stronger: El G 2000m or Komen 300m WRs??

LISTEN TO ME!!!!!

drivel snarf burp fart idiot basic intrinsic

~ 5m wide! suicide first ~ 35m! moron barf gargle slurp

jizz swallow is this a joke basic barf fart gag moron

jizzel drivel slurp fart choke sh*t are you dense?

basic ~ 3'24! jim ryun secret man crush jizz barf intrinsic

is this a joke? my predictions are superior to all others slurp gag drivel

i am vent, i am calculo, i am LR love child of retardo canova and rekrunner! Drivel snarf

barf snurf gag puke moron basic drivel intrinsic joke gargle gurgle idiot

quote myself within a quote within a quote am i serious

is this a joke?

barf fart gasp moron drivel 26 flat basic jizz jim ryun into my mouth rubbish

intrinsic moron myself quote wabbit idiot gargle

buffoon burp slurp swallow gasp choke gag drivel basic

snurf sniffle drivel dribble slurp burp gag barf moron

are you dense?

is this a joke?

do you not no basic maths?

~5m wide basic 3'24! are you dense

WR!!! under fantasy conditions can you not listen!

idiot moron predictions im wrong always quote myself within a quote drivel

your not as smart slurp as me burp i am vent gag

barf barf moron intrinsic basic joke

you can't seem to comprehend that even 100m at mexico woud require oxygen to run flat out for 100m & thinner air of 7,300' of hypoxia foerr aerobic metabolisnm counterbalances some, if not most all of lesser air resistance

I'd like to see some evidence of that. Sounds like bullshi*t to me

An isolated 100m run is not aerobic by any stretch of the imagination. It's totally hypoxic regardless. You don't need to take in a single breath. Watch Linford.

Even in the 400m I'd estimate that the amount of oxygen one is able to take in during the race exceeds the amount one can actually use, even at altitude.

ex-runner wrote:

you can't seem to comprehend that even 100m at mexico woud require oxygen to run flat out for 100m & thinner air of 7,300' of hypoxia foerr aerobic metabolisnm counterbalances some, if not most all of lesser air resistance

I'd like to see some evidence of that. Sounds like bullshi*t to me

An isolated 100m run is not aerobic by any stretch of the imagination. It's totally hypoxic regardless. You don't need to take in a single breath. Watch Linford.

Even in the 400m I'd estimate that the amount of oxygen one is able to take in during the race exceeds the amount one can actually use, even at altitude.

i'd like to see just what vent/calculo looks like

i picture a short, overweight Indian, 90s style hair cut with a part on the left side, glasses and a pocket protector.

and Indian mean like between Bangladesh and Pakistan.

Here are some more for your list:

"nonsense"

"just because you see a clocking your brain doesn't comprehend it means it has to be doped"

"laughable !!!"

"do you have any clue about the sport ???"

"laughable !"

"so what ???"

"both hugely inferior to 3'26.0"

"and both times are clearly medically assisted in my opinion

utter nonsense"

This entire post is hot garbage. You make a completely bull statement that you need an "even whole number clocking" for your calculation that you don't even explain ("logarithmic equivalency tables" are literally something you made up), pull some "equivalent times" from where the sun don't shine, choose one of them, give no reason for that choice, and then somehow use this to conclude something.

This is impressively bad. It's so bad that I'm second guessing the fact that I agree with you. Go sit in the corner and think about what you've done.

It just crossed my mind that calculo's fabled "logarithmic equivalency tables" may be referring to tables containing information such as "log_b(y)=x" arranged for many values of x, y, and/or b. These are called logarithm tables and the statement "log_b(y)=x" denotes a "logarithmic equivalent." I doubt this is the case, but if it is he still needs to explain how it's useful and what information is in the tables specifically.