Please. Alison Stokke is so 2007.
based on your maths, Rupp is so 2004.
graduated high school decade ago wrote:
Please. Alison Stokke is so 2007.
2007 looks pretty good right now.
odd that in the same moment america is disgusted by the actions of Roy More while also gushing over a picture of a teenager in tights
L.A. people get all the undeserved attention. O.J. , David Cassidy, Kobe, Jordan Hasay, Beckham, Weinstein, James Harden, you name it, they all S U C K!
For a website criticizing people for giving her attention for her looks and not sporting achievements, they sure used a lot of pictures of her in the article.
DietBacon wrote:
For a website criticizing people for giving her attention for her looks and not sporting achievements, they sure used a lot of pictures of her in the article.
Her youtube channel is similarly baffling. She could choose to wear a t-shirt in her videos, but she goes with booty shorts and a sports bra. She also just happens to include lots of well frames shots of her butt.
Hayduke wrote:
odd that in the same moment america is disgusted by the actions of Roy More while also gushing over a picture of a teenager in tights
Not so odd when you consider the number of racist, right wing, science denying, home schooled religious nuts on this forum.
http://d29l8fj0bhi1tg.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/19080737/stokke6.jpgDietBacon wrote:
For a website criticizing people for giving her attention for her looks and not sporting achievements, they sure used a lot of pictures of her in the article.
Sdfsdfsdfsdf wrote:
DietBacon wrote:
For a website criticizing people for giving her attention for her looks and not sporting achievements, they sure used a lot of pictures of her in the article.
Her youtube channel is similarly baffling. She could choose to wear a t-shirt in her videos, but she goes with booty shorts and a sports bra. She also just happens to include lots of well frames shots of her butt.
Doctors call it the "hey there delilah syndrome" while in the same breath bemoaning their celebrity being based on superficial things, they then struggle to prove that the attention they receive is based on talents or skill. They then fall back on what made them popular in the first place......being young and attractive.... however now that they are in their late 20's and beyond, now they are just attractive. kinds of kills the mode for those who really just liked young and attractive.
She appears to be attractive.
@Hayduke wrote:
Hayduke wrote:
odd that in the same moment america is disgusted by the actions of Roy More while also gushing over a picture of a teenager in tights
Not so odd when you consider the number of racist, right wing, science denying, home schooled religious nuts on this forum.
Not so odd when you consider the number of racist, LEFT wing, science believing fools, and nuts in general on this forum.
Good luck when you lose your neighborhood and can't get them out. Who is them? No, it's not racist, it's reality.
Them=bad people here to do harm and get free stuff, aka work the system. I'm glad you support them, keep doing it little guy.
Gravy wrote:
http://d29l8fj0bhi1tg.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/19080737/stokke6.jpgDietBacon wrote:
For a website criticizing people for giving her attention for her looks and not sporting achievements, they sure used a lot of pictures of her in the article.
Lol and people here think Emma Coburn is hot smh
Love how she wanted to be taken seriously as athlete, not so much for here looks. When the Athlete thing didn't work out, she went out and became instagram Model and golf Wag.
Work the system like a billionaire asking for a tax break?
Get your poles signed!
Reality BiTEs SPanKy wrote:
Consider the number of science believing fools on this forum.
I know, the nerve of people, buying into factual knowledge! What the hell is wrong with this country?
Next thing you know people will be criticizing that Picasso painting of a cow who serves as the WH press sec for constantly lying. I mean, what's the big deal?
Keep blaming the darkies for your own incompetence in managing your life. You're probably among the many "real Americans" (i.e., white slack-jawed morons) who think illegals can just show up here and get on welfare and Medicaid.
Reality BiTEs SPanKy wrote:
@Hayduke wrote:
Not so odd when you consider the number of racist, right wing, science denying, home schooled religious nuts on this forum.
Not so odd when you consider the number of racist, LEFT wing, science believing fools, and nuts in general on this forum.
Good luck when you lose your neighborhood and can't get them out. Who is them? No, it's not racist, it's reality.
Them=bad people here to do harm and get free stuff, aka work the system. I'm glad you support them, keep doing it little guy.
You realize that calling someone a believer in science is not an insult, right?
Inbred Angery Rascist wrote:
You're probably among the many "real Americans" (i.e., white slack-jawed morons) who think illegals can just show up here and get on welfare and Medicaid.
Actually, they do get Medicaid, at least here in California. They're entitled to pregnancy and emergency services, but they can get full benefits by claiming what is known as Prucol (Permanent Residence Under Color of Law). Also, since last year, Senate Bill 75 gave full benefits to all undocumented children on Medicaid.