So the main two criteria for "corroboration" and truthiness that WaPo gave us were that: she gave her story freely, and she gave the story 6 times in interviews with it all tying together. But now both are flipped to show the opposite.
Basically trawling all of Alabama for people who would slob anti-Moore stuff all over the place. Not exactly what one expects from "investigative reporting", and indeed WaPo once had to give up a Pulitzer because of outright fabrication.
Here's the second leg, crumbled too:
On the face of it, Moore’s detractors may purport the location of Corfman’s phone matters little, but the Post story relies heavily on Corfman’s memory and her ability to recount events consistently.
If Corfman cannot accurately recall if Moore called a phone in her room, what else was falsely claimed?