Congratulations, you, one of, or all of your personalities have made the best case on this thread for more gun control in this country.
Congratulations, you, one of, or all of your personalities have made the best case on this thread for more gun control in this country.
AussieAussieAussie wrote:
Obviously people protecting us should have guns. I'm talking about the regular person. Go talk to a shrink if you're that scared about living in this country you think you need a gun for "protection".
You own a gun - you're a weak coward.
Hitlery, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot all agree with you.
Americans will never be disarmed libbbtwats. But please keep crying, it is all you can you got. Nothing you do or say will disarm the Citizens of the USA😎🇺🇸
truth2022 wrote:
fake as can be ..............................................
if you dont see this ,cant help you .
keep your weapons as you will need them in years to come.
anyway automatic weapons may as already be banned there
as very hard to get .
Automatic weapons are banned as of 1986, but you can buy automatic weapons that were built before 1986 subject to restrictions and taxes. But that doesn't matter because a bump stock very efficiently turns a semi automatic assault rifle into a fully automatic rifle. Paddock had these. They are legal. Funny how you do not hear anything from the NRA about passing legislation to make these illegal.
For the gun nuts out their, clinging to the 2nd amendment is just a pretext for being able to be a law unto yourself. When gun nuts do not like what the Supreme Court, Congress or the President do, they talk about how they are armed and will use their fire arms to protect the constitution from a corrupt government. But they really mean that when our government functions normally and they do not like the result, they get to have a firearm veto and dispense their own version of justice.
finisher medal hander outer wrote:
Congratulations, you, one of, or all of your personalities have made the best case on this thread for more gun control in this country.
Congratulations you are just another delusional libbbtwat that will never see a single law abiding citizen of these United States striped of their right to keep and bear arms.
But do continue your 😢 I rather enjoy the misery of the libbbtwatðŸ‘
Alpha Maverick wrote:
Whoever did this was extremely well trained.
Crazy thought, but maybe a guy who packs 23 guns in a hotel room, a number of them modified for automatic fire, has spent a bit of time on the range?
What is it like knowing We The People will never be disarmed?
Discuss.
Perhaps you should move to another country?
Oh no the world is going to endâ—ï¸
Libbbtwats RUN FOR YOUR LIVES😂â—ï¸
Monkeys typing wrote:
Alpha Maverick wrote:Whoever did this was extremely well trained.
Crazy thought, but maybe a guy who packs 23 guns in a hotel room, a number of them modified for automatic fire, has spent a bit of time on the range?
Well, they were semi-auto. Personally, I don't think time on the range could produce such a sharpshooter. The shooter was popping head shots when people where taking cover and looking up. From 1,700 ft that's pretty amazing. There's maybe 20 people in the US military that could pull off what he did last night.
This shooter had Middle East desert training imo.
Interesting response. You avoided any indication as to whether you were for against any of the controls mentioned that the NRA has fought against.I can see why they are difficulty questions for you to publicly express your opinion.Easier just to say I know more about guns and gun laws than you do.
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
XY wrote:^ Exactly
Neither of you obviously know anything about firearms, or the multitude of laws that regulate them. Or it appears, the fact that many already on the books aren't estimated even enforced, or the charges are plea bargained away.
Alpha Maverick wrote:
Monkeys typing wrote:Crazy thought, but maybe a guy who packs 23 guns in a hotel room, a number of them modified for automatic fire, has spent a bit of time on the range?
Well, they were semi-auto. Personally, I don't think time on the range could produce such a sharpshooter. The shooter was popping head shots when people where taking cover and looking up. From 1,700 ft that's pretty amazing. There's maybe 20 people in the US military that could pull off what he did last night.
This shooter had Middle East desert training imo.
Is this true, or is it just that he was firing so many bullets that some hit people in the head? I haven't listened to the whole 10 minutes of firing, but if it all sounded like the parts I've heard where the gun was rapid firing, then there could not have been any precise aiming. Snipers do not fire 5+ shots per second for an extended period of time.
see? brains!
http://time.com/4478798/father-shoots-daughters-cleaning-gun-police/
http://www.wptv.com/news/state/florida-father-accidentally-shoots-kills-son-while-cleaning-gun
this one sounds fishy; might be suicide covered up or else he's one real real dumb cop
Just great, the angry lunatic is arguing that we should have what ever guns we want. Feel safer everyone? You are the poster boy FOR gun control.
DRINK F*** FIGHT wrote:
What is it like knowing We The People will never be disarmed?
Discuss.
Perhaps you should move to another country?
posted without comment wrote:
http://www.motherjones.com/wp-content/uploads/gun-ownership-vs-gun-deaths_2.png
I'm trying to keep out of the US gun debate, but Illinois is literally half the total of US deaths each year so this phoney Mother Jones chart is fake.
they banned lawn darts wrote:
Statistically speaking we are doing great. An American is more likely to be killed in an auto accident than by the gun. I don’t see any libbbtwats wanting to ban cars.
Every year auto manufacturers introduce new safety device to make cars safer. New and/or stricter laws and regulations are passed all the time to make driving safer.
They are LITERALLY building cars that will drive themselves so fewer dvmbass drivers are killed every year.
Guns get less safe and more lethal every year.
Kind of backwards.
The car analogy is one of the most stupid arguments that gun nuts /NRA puppets spew. A car's purpose is transportation from A to B. It has a useful purpose in society. A gun's only purpose is to kill.
You guys are so uninformed.
You don't understand the basics.
The Founding Fathers were more intelligent than you.
There are some 400+ independent Leaders in this Country, there are 50 State Govenors, there are Thousands of Sheriffs, there are many State Police ...
You actually think a mentally ill President Hillary Granny Clinton, a Community Organizer Obama, a Washed Up George W, a John Kerry, a McLame .... Could convince our Military or 1,000 US Leaders to wage war on the People ....
You are unintelligent, in all due respect ....
First ... What are you going to tell the WIFE MOTHERS SONS And DAUGHTERS when the fire dead Soldiers go home ....
WAR is not Easy ....
WAR is not a Video Game ..
READ some history will you
Please I beg you to inform yourselfs.
Our forefathers were remarkable. The amount of foresight they had to carefully craft the pillars of our democracy helped produce the greatest country in the world.
They were not infallible, they were not oracles. They got the 2nd amendment wrong.
That said, there is no going back. We will never be able to rid ourselves of that err.
The only angry lunatics are you and rest of your libbbtwat brethren.I am Free to have as many fckn guns as I please fckr😆â—ï¸â—ï¸â—ï¸Nothing will ever change that. YOU ARE THE POSTER GIRL FOR STUPID.😎🇺🇸
Uncle Thomas?? wrote:
Just great, the angry lunatic is arguing that we should have what ever guns we want. Feel safer everyone?
You are the poster boy FOR gun control.
DRINK F*** FIGHT wrote:What is it like knowing We The People will never be disarmed?
Discuss.
Perhaps you should move to another country?
Subway Surfers Addiction wrote:
posted without comment wrote:http://www.motherjones.com/wp-content/uploads/gun-ownership-vs-gun-deaths_2.pngI'm trying to keep out of the US gun debate, but Illinois is literally half the total of US deaths each year so this phoney Mother Jones chart is fake.
What is it about lying that is so appealing to you?
Illinois is not even one of the top 5 states in the US as measured by total gun deaths. And on a per capita basis it is actually one of the 15 SAFEST states as measured by gun deaths per capita.
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/sosmap/firearm_mortality/firearm.htmSeriously, why is lying so important to you?
still waiting to know your position on these
Conundrum wrote:
Interesting response. You avoided any indication as to whether you were for against any of the controls mentioned that the NRA has fought against.
I can see why they are difficulty questions for you to publicly express your opinion.
Easier just to say I know more about guns and gun laws than you do.
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:Neither of you obviously know anything about firearms, or the multitude of laws that regulate them. Or it appears, the fact that many already on the books aren't estimated even enforced, or the charges are plea bargained away.