The first one was awesome and a new one comes out next month. The trailers look pretty cool.
Thoughts?
I'll be there opening night.
The first one was awesome and a new one comes out next month. The trailers look pretty cool.
Thoughts?
I'll be there opening night.
John Utah wrote:
The first one was awesome and a new one comes out next month. The trailers look pretty cool.
Thoughts?
I'll be there opening night.
It can not match the aura of the original.. But I will see it day one
XY wrote:
John Utah wrote:The first one was awesome and a new one comes out next month. The trailers look pretty cool.
Thoughts?
I'll be there opening night.
It can not match the aura of the original.. But I will see it day one
I hear you 100%, but have you seen the trailers on YouTube? Same director. The "aura" might be there. There is a chance.
As long as Harrison Ford isn't flying a plane to the premier it should be okay.
Daryl Hannah might not be as flexible as she once was.
MAGA
John Utah wrote:
The first one was awesome and a new one comes out next month. The trailers look pretty cool.
Thoughts?
I'll be there opening night.
Yeah, I can't tell from the trailer. It could be good or terrible, I can't tell. But I will go see it in the theater.
John Utah wrote:
The first one was awesome and a new one comes out next month. The trailers look pretty cool.
Thoughts?
I'll be there opening night.
Anyone else stoked that Shinichiro Watanabe is doing an animated Bladerunner 1.5...? 🙌ðŸ½
Trump2020OP-the real one wrote:
As long as Harrison Ford isn't flying a plane to the premier it should be okay.
Daryl Hannah might not be as flexible as she once was.
MAGA
LOL
Jared Leto looks to provide a great performance as the engineer of blade runners, illegally.
Did anyone like that short film prologue?
The better the trailer, the worse that the movie usually is. So I don't have much hope.
I hear you 100%, but have you seen the trailers on YouTube? Same director. The "aura" might be there. There is a chance.
Hunh? Ridley Scott was original BR director, Denis Villeneuve is the new director. Both real talents, both usually have strong casts and apparently actors love to work with Villeneuve. Villeneuve's "Arrival" was what M. Night Shyamalan *should* have trended too, but he drifted off into utter nonsense after his initial hits. I like the fact that Villeneuve tried not to green screen the character out of the movie, he's still somewhat old school. Anyway, here's some more backstory with some cool pics.
https://moviepilot.com/p/blade-runner-2049-director-denis-villeneuve-actresses-secret-weapon/4333854http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/la-ca-mn-0903-sneaks-blade-runner-gallery-20170903-story.html2049 has a chance if 2017 Ridley wasn't involved.
vivalarepublica wrote:
The better the trailer, the worse that the movie usually is. So I don't have much hope.
Valid point
Denis sez wrote:
I hear you 100%, but have you seen the trailers on YouTube? Same director. The "aura" might be there. There is a chance.Hunh? Ridley Scott was original BR director, Denis Villeneuve is the new director. Both real talents, both usually have strong casts and apparently actors love to work with Villeneuve. Villeneuve's "Arrival" was what M. Night Shyamalan *should* have trended too, but he drifted off into utter nonsense after his initial hits. I like the fact that Villeneuve tried not to green screen the character out of the movie, he's still somewhat old school. Anyway, here's some more backstory with some cool pics.
https://moviepilot.com/p/blade-runner-2049-director-denis-villeneuve-actresses-secret-weapon/4333854http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/la-ca-mn-0903-sneaks-blade-runner-gallery-20170903-story.html
My bad
Denis sez wrote:
[quote] I like the fact that Villeneuve tried not to green screen the character out of the movie, he's still somewhat old school.
I guarantee you that the amount of GS/CG/VFX used in this film and 90% of movies nowadays would make your jaw drop. The trend is definitely always to downplay whenever they can, but trust me it's everywhere. When done right you usually don't notice. The problem is the 25% done wrong is what everyone sees/notices and gives it a bad name. The right approach, which seems to be what they've done here, is to take the practical as far as feasible and then augment with CG. It's too bad for the CG artists working 80 hours a week on it on it, that it's often reported as "all practical" by the director/media. I'm sure there were thousands of CG/VFX shots in this movie, will be interesting to see how that's reported.
Granted I'm born in the 90's, but I didn't know about the first Blade Runner until I watched it in a film course 3 years ago, and this one looks way better.
Without Rutger Hauer forget it
Leto Fan wrote:
Granted I'm born in the 90's, but I didn't know about the first Blade Runner until I watched it in a film course 3 years ago, and this one looks way better.
You either didn't pay attention in that film course or it was a bad film course. Because based on the trailer, 2049 looks it has the potential to replace a good story with modern remake movie-making tropes, like too much reliance on CG and action sequences and too much explaining rather than showing a story.
already looking up wrote:
2049 has a chance if 2017 Ridley wasn't involved.
Judging by Prometheus, you are correct.
vivalarepublica wrote:
Judging by Prometheus, you are correct.
Prometheus was not bad. It just wasn't what we thought it was gonna be. Nothing much really happened, but it wasn't a bad movie. Just not the action movie people were expecting. I don't even know what genre to put it in. It was more like the beginning of a 3-4 hour movie.
I saw the original one in college and I liked the mood and atmosphere but the plot was a little light. Since then I've rewatched it probably once every 18 months and I just never got it.