One Sided Narrative wrote:
So anti doping bodies are expected to hand dopers, and therefore their suppliers every detail about tests so they can more quickly find a way around them. Don’t think so. Doping authorities are not required to give all details of tests to the accused. Why pretend they are? It’s not a court case, and even in court cases not everything is required to be handed over.
The actual scientific detail required by suppliers is already contained in the published peer reviews journals.
The detail of the evidence is required to ensure that the test itself was conducted with the above.
The disclosure/ discovery process is indeed designed to hand the required evidence over.
The current WADA code does require the evidence required to be provided and at the time of the Edwards case such was provided freely in other cases.
In the Edwards case non of the above principles were followed.
I will think you will now agree that you are out of your depth.