maybe true, unless he is over rated wrote:
TB12 wrote:
The Steelers secondary is awful. If their DL doesn’t get to Brady, he will pick them apart.
You are correct about the Steelers secondary, Brady was not able to pick them apart though.
...because the Steelers pressured him.
moist wrote:
Wilson is #2 right now. If the last 2 games are an indication of what Brady has left, the prize is going to someone else.
And Russell Wilson looked invincible today?
Russel Wilson is the GOAT. He just has the NFL's worst O line right now & practically the entire Hawk defense is inured right now. Wait until next year when hawks actually invest in a decent o line & get the defense healthy again.
Wilson is amazing. I think he has 2x as many rushing yards as the next leading rusher on his team. He's responsible for over 80% of Seattle's yards.
Change @ Park wrote:
moist wrote:
Wilson is #2 right now. If the last 2 games are an indication of what Brady has left, the prize is going to someone else.
And Russell Wilson looked invincible today?
Ummm... ever heard of Carson Wentz? How about Jared Goff?
TB12 wrote:
He looked awful last night, but he still leads the league in passing yards and qb rating (regular starters).
I'm quitting. You guys are right. I'm washed up, busted, too old and rickety.
lmao wrote:
Change @ Park wrote:
And Russell Wilson looked invincible today?
Ummm... ever heard of Carson Wentz? How about Jared Goff?
Wilson crushed Wentz head to head. Also crushed Goff @ LA when he actually had a defense. See that's the thing. Wilson has beat all the so called best QBs head to head. Brady, Rodgers, Brees, Manning etc
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Bowl_XLIXWilson owns Brady Rodgers Manning Wentz Brees wrote:
Wilson has beat all the so called best QBs head to head. Brady, Rodgers, Brees, Manning etc
2-1 record overall though against Brady.
Wilson owns Brady wrote:
2-1 record overall though against Brady.
Which one meant the most?
Hellooooooo? wrote:
Which one meant the most?
How much they mean is irrelevant to how much they count. They all count equally.
All the QB's mentioned here are obviously good, but until they have 5 rings, winning percentage of .774 and are up there in MVP discussions at 40, they are not in the same league.
The GOAT has been dominant since 2001. Let's see how long R.W. lasts.
John Hannah wrote:
All the QB's mentioned here are obviously good, but until they have 5 rings, winning percentage of .774 and are up there in MVP discussions at 40, they are not in the same league.
The GOAT has been dominant since 2001. Let's see how long R.W. lasts.
Let's be honest, 2 of those rings were pure luck. Brady threw 2 picks against Seattle and lucked out on A) Pete making the worst call in NFL history, and B) Ricardo Lockette executing said play like a giant, moist p*ssy. Last year Brady was beat to a pulp, but Shanahan inexplicably ran a hurry-up offense in a situation where every football fan in the world knows you run. the. clock.
Also, has anyone benefited more from biased officiating than Brady? If last night doesn't prove that.... You know if the script were flipped and that was Brady throwing to Gronk, that's ruled a TD without hesitation.
[quote]moo wrote:
Much like Allen Webb, he is old, slow and a shadow of his former self.
He was always slow, very slow.
fsdfsdfsdfsdf wrote:
John Hannah wrote:
All the QB's mentioned here are obviously good, but until they have 5 rings, winning percentage of .774 and are up there in MVP discussions at 40, they are not in the same league.
The GOAT has been dominant since 2001. Let's see how long R.W. lasts.
Let's be honest, 2 of those rings were pure luck. Brady threw 2 picks against Seattle and lucked out on A) Pete making the worst call in NFL history, and B) Ricardo Lockette executing said play like a giant, moist p*ssy. Last year Brady was beat to a pulp, but Shanahan inexplicably ran a hurry-up offense in a situation where every football fan in the world knows you run. the. clock.
Also, has anyone benefited more from biased officiating than Brady? If last night doesn't prove that.... You know if the script were flipped and that was Brady throwing to Gronk, that's ruled a TD without hesitation.
It WAS a fumble. Settle down, professor.
Mr. Mellotron wrote:
Let's be honest, 2 of those rings were pure luck. Brady threw 2 picks against Seattle and lucked out on A) Pete making the worst call in NFL history, and B) Ricardo Lockette executing said play like a giant, moist p*ssy. Last year Brady was beat to a pulp, but Shanahan inexplicably ran a hurry-up offense in a situation where every football fan in the world knows you run. the. clock.
Also, has anyone benefited more from biased officiating than Brady? If last night doesn't prove that.... You know if the script were flipped and that was Brady throwing to Gronk, that's ruled a TD without hesitation.
It WAS a fumble. Settle down, professor.[/quote]
Lol "a fumble." You're such a Pats fan.
fsdfsdfsdfsdf wrote:
John Hannah wrote:
All the QB's mentioned here are obviously good, but until they have 5 rings, winning percentage of .774 and are up there in MVP discussions at 40, they are not in the same league.
The GOAT has been dominant since 2001. Let's see how long R.W. lasts.
Let's be honest, 2 of those rings were pure luck. Brady threw 2 picks against Seattle and lucked out on A) Pete making the worst call in NFL history, and B) Ricardo Lockette executing said play like a giant, moist p*ssy. Last year Brady was beat to a pulp, but Shanahan inexplicably ran a hurry-up offense in a situation where every football fan in the world knows you run. the. clock.
Also, has anyone benefited more from biased officiating than Brady? If last night doesn't prove that.... You know if the script were flipped and that was Brady throwing to Gronk, that's ruled a TD without hesitation.
If two of those wins were luck, then you must admit his two losses were also luck. It’s a wash.
Regarding yesterday's non-TD, it’s a dumb rule. Yet it is a rule and this is not the first time we've seen it called that way. Just ask Dez Bryant.
fsdfsdfsdfsdf wrote:
Mr. Mellotron wrote:
Let's be honest, 2 of those rings were pure luck. Brady threw 2 picks against Seattle and lucked out on A) Pete making the worst call in NFL history, and B) Ricardo Lockette executing said play like a giant, moist p*ssy. Last year Brady was beat to a pulp, but Shanahan inexplicably ran a hurry-up offense in a situation where every football fan in the world knows you run. the. clock.
Also, has anyone benefited more from biased officiating than Brady? If last night doesn't prove that.... You know if the script were flipped and that was Brady throwing to Gronk, that's ruled a TD without hesitation.
It WAS a fumble. Settle down, professor.
Lol "a fumble." You're such a Pats fan.[/quote] Nah. Just more familiar with the NFL rule book than you are.
Mr. Mellotron wrote:
fsdfsdfsdfsdf wrote:
It WAS a fumble. Settle down, professor.
Lol "a fumble." You're such a Pats fan.
Nah. Just more familiar with the NFL rule book than you are.[/quote]
OMG you're actually doubling down.
A fumble. Are you sure it was a fumble? Is that what was called?
Must be a Pats fan.
It was not a fumble. Nor was it a completed catch.