8.2 mph at 1:49
8.2 mph at 1:49
10.86 mph at 2:18
Results wrote:
Bread crumbs at 1:09, 1:19, 1:22, and 1:43
Movement recorded for all of those. I don't know why the Garmin stopped doing it's regular transmitting every two minutes.
It seems to be not being in motion. Gamin either doesn't record them or it buries newer points under older ones.
So far today wrote:
Results wrote:Bread crumbs at 1:09, 1:19, 1:22, and 1:43
Movement recorded for all of those. I don't know why the Garmin stopped doing it's regular transmitting every two minutes.
It seems to be not being in motion. Gamin either doesn't record them or it buries newer points under older ones.
We get the points showing 0.00 mph when it's on, but yeah maybe they're buried.
I think they are buried because when a lunch break occurs a breadcrumb is places, then when they restart it is the same point but the breadcrumb data is still the stopping time.
Does she look much thinner than before?
Results wrote:
+1
Video of Mimi on the bridge:
https://www.facebook.com/649065219/videos/10159552798175220/
OCT 11th:
Start Times: Sandy 2:59 AM / Mimi 3:09 AM
As of 7:41 AM: Sandy 20 miles / Mimi 17
As of 8:50 AM: Sandy 25 miles / Mimi 21-1/2
As of 9:52 AM: Sandy 30 miles / Mimi 26
As of 10:52 AM: Sandy 35 miles / Mimi 29
Lunch Break, Sandy: 35 miles (10:52 - 11:19 AM, 27 minutes)
Lunch Break, Mimi: 31 miles (11:33 - 12:05 PM, 32 minutes)
As of 12:23 PM: Sandy 40 miles / Mimi 32 miles
As of 1:30 PM: Sandy 45 miles / Mimi 35 miles
Hospital Stop, Mimi: Start 1:10 PM, Leave 1:44 PM (34 minutes)
As of 1:33 PM: Sandy 50 miles / Mimi 37-1/2
- Sandy +49 minutes of running time
Just read back through the last dozen or so pages and as best as I can figure it we're just taking random bits of information and making up as outlandish a lie as we can to fit it? Is that about right?
Has anyone mentioned the hoverboard she's using yet?
I just downloaded Mimi's Strava file for the Sept. 10, 2017 morning run that includes the cadence data and converted it to CSV for analysis. I'm beginning to think Suunto watches have a serious reliability problem. If you plot the data without any of the aggressive smoothing that Strava or Movescount does, you will see lots of cadence values above 200 spm and even quite a few at 500 spm! I don't see how cadence data can be used as any indicator of proof when it's so bad.
So far today wrote:
Does she look much thinner than before?
Results wrote:+1
Video of Mimi on the bridge:
https://www.facebook.com/649065219/videos/10159552798175220/
Yes, she looks extremely frail to me. And of course, she's not running in the video. She had more 12 minute miles in her morning run today. How, I don't know.
Baffled wrote:
Just read back through the last dozen or so pages and as best as I can figure it we're just taking random bits of information and making up as outlandish a lie as we can to fit it? Is that about right?
Has anyone mentioned the hoverboard she's using yet?
No, that isn't right. If anyone is making anything up, it's you.
Mimi's team has brought this on themselves. Some transparency would go a long way. As it is, we have to guess at what is going on.
Baffled wrote:
Just read back through the last dozen or so pages and as best as I can figure it we're just taking random bits of information and making up as outlandish a lie as we can to fit it? Is that about right?
Has anyone mentioned the hoverboard she's using yet?
I think we are actually very fair and evidence based in this thread. We haven't seen any convincing evidence that Mimi ran her first 2 weeks like she claims to have.
Results wrote:
So far today wrote:Does she look much thinner than before?
Yes, she looks extremely frail to me. And of course, she's not running in the video. She had more 12 minute miles in her morning run today. How, I don't know.
Sorry, 12 minute miles were GAP and not Pace. I looked at the wrong column. I should have said 13 minute miles.
Baffled wrote:
Just read back through the last dozen or so pages and as best as I can figure it we're just taking random bits of information and making up as outlandish a lie as we can to fit it? Is that about right?
Has anyone mentioned the hoverboard she's using yet?
Hi Tim!
As of 2:33 PM: Sandy 50 miles / Mimi 37-1/2
Results wrote:
+1
Video of Mimi on the bridge:
https://www.facebook.com/649065219/videos/10159552798175220/
In that video, she walks the whole way: none of the hypothesized alternating run/walk every 30 seconds. And for the section of the video up until she stops and waves, I counted her cadence as 126 steps/minute.
Scam_Watcheroo wrote:
I just downloaded Mimi's Strava file for the Sept. 10, 2017 morning run
Interesting, how do you do that? I had looked for some kind of "download" option, and concluded it didn't exist.
Results wrote:
+1
Video of Mimi on the bridge:
https://www.facebook.com/649065219/videos/10159552798175220/
She looks fairly broken in that clip, foot placement going from side to side like a drunk and very low on strength. I doubt she can keep going for much longer.
Not a doctor wrote:
Results wrote:+1
Video of Mimi on the bridge:
https://www.facebook.com/649065219/videos/10159552798175220/
She looks fairly broken in that clip, foot placement going from side to side like a drunk and very low on strength. I doubt she can keep going for much longer.
Calories are very important in an even like this. A comparison might be with water. If you wait to drink until your are thirsty you waited too long. You really cannot recover by guzzling or by binge eating.
RIP: D3 All-American Frank Csorba - who ran 13:56 in March - dead
Great interview with Steve Cram - says Jakob has no chance of WRs this year
RENATO can you talk about the preparation of Emile Cairess 2:06
Hats off to my dad. He just ran a 1:42 Half Marathon and turns 75 in 2 months!
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion
adizero Road to Records with Yomif Kejelcha, Agnes Ngetich, Hobbs Kessler & many more is Saturday