I have been an 800m runner for quite a few years. I ran 1:55.6 in high school, but by junior year of college I have only improved to 1:53.5. My 400 is 49.3 (relay split, and I ran 50.7 split in high school).. and my 5k during xc is 15:43. Should my 800m pb be faster in light of my 400 and 5k?
No. You just ran your 5k PR on a short course.
I finish my 8k xc races a few seconds behind guys who run 15:30s in track.
PortlandXCGirl wrote:
No. You just ran your 5k PR on a short course.
How do you know the course is short?
Yeah, I woulda guessed 1:51.
PortlandXCGirl wrote:
No. You just ran your 5k PR on a short course.
Common excuse for a freaking second rate runner like you who has never seen or probably even heard of the course but called it short. The guy ran 1:55, that takes skill to do that in hs. I wouldn't doubt his 15:43
Are you in D1, OP?
(I'm not really the appropriate age for midlife crisis. But I'm feeling it).
800m woes wrote:
I have been an 800m runner for quite a few years. I ran 1:55.6 in high school, but by junior year of college I have only improved to 1:53.5. My 400 is 49.3 (relay split, and I ran 50.7 split in high school).. and my 5k during xc is 15:43. Should my 800m pb be faster in light of my 400 and 5k?
I don't think it should be faster. Your 400 isn't that great for a good 800 runner and I bet you are really a second slower.
Don't get me wrong, 1:53 is a very good time, but if you are properly trained you probably won't get much faster. Certainly not sub 1:50 with that 400 speed.
The issue is your 400m PB is not a PB at all. It's a hand timed relay split. Literally meaningless.
Do the math wrote:
800m woes wrote:I have been an 800m runner for quite a few years. I ran 1:55.6 in high school, but by junior year of college I have only improved to 1:53.5. My 400 is 49.3 (relay split, and I ran 50.7 split in high school).. and my 5k during xc is 15:43. Should my 800m pb be faster in light of my 400 and 5k?
I don't think it should be faster. Your 400 isn't that great for a good 800 runner and I bet you are really a second slower.
Don't get me wrong, 1:53 is a very good time, but if you are properly trained you probably won't get much faster. Certainly not sub 1:50 with that 400 speed.
Exactly, work on your speed, get down to 48-49 open
RIP: D3 All-American Frank Csorba - who ran 13:56 in March - dead
RENATO can you talk about the preparation of Emile Cairess 2:06
Running for Bowerman Track Club used to be cool now its embarrassing
Great interview with Steve Cram - says Jakob has no chance of WRs this year
Hats off to my dad. He just ran a 1:42 Half Marathon and turns 75 in 2 months!
2017 World 800 champ Pierre-Ambroise Bosse banned 1 year for whereabouts failures