Just Wrong wrote:
Yes and No. wrote:John Hawryluk
@jbeaton1993
Replying to @kathyldaniels @53Marathons and 3 others
Don't think the issue ever was data being incorrect - GWR accepted that. It's about her BF being down as a witness.
11:10 AM - 6 Aug 2017
Yes and no John Hawryluk, yes, the issue so far for GWR hasn't been about "data being incorrect" for reasons stated above, no, GWR haven't "accepted that" (data) because they haven't had any need to look at it.
Incorrect. GWR has been contacted and the data was accepted, but witness was not.
Just to clear this up.
While we found Dave Keighley to be an unacceptable witness all the information provided by this unacceptable witness was found to be completely acceptable.