But he says he's got it. If he refuses to share it then that will be the final nail in the coffin of Amy's claims and we can all go back to our lives.
But he says he's got it. If he refuses to share it then that will be the final nail in the coffin of Amy's claims and we can all go back to our lives.
ExpertKipWatcher wrote:
the_real_Brit_1 wrote:This guy is trying WAY too hard to prove his Britishness.
In the age of the internet, people can try and claim to be anyone they want.
However, like with this bloke, google searches don't give one the right context and they are easily exposed as frauds.
I think you are trying way too hard to claim something that I have already demonstrated is false.
Quite the opposite.You have only demonstrated that you can use google...albeit out of context.
Time to give up the chirade. You know the one you pronounce like ʃəˈrÉ‘Ëd). :)
Good post from Lindley Chambers who also got involved with Terrie in the Reading scam:
"Lindley Chambers You are dealing with GWR they have rejected your claim as the mileages can not be verified as you signed the log book off. If you want the public to believe you you need give them some evidence but you don't want to do that. Why?
If you had nothing to hide you would be open about it. Writing a massive rant is not evidence or proof. If you want believed you need to prove it. You have already lied about several things to me on on the original thread and mislead the public about your claims.
You claim there is 24/7 footage but nobody has seen it. You claim there were independent witnesses but you, a PR person and a physio and a friend are not independent.
You claims she lost 2 stone yet you could provide the logs for that. In fact you could show all of us up to be mistaken idiots by simply showing us the evidence!
But instead you rant and race and bomb and blast and verbally dance but don't answer questions. Why?
Like
1 · 1 hr · Edited
Strava wrote:
But he says he's got it. If he refuses to share it then that will be the final nail in the coffin of Amy's claims and we can all go back to our lives.
Let's hope that they are furiously trying to recreate the data by biking the 53 marathons, ala Jane Seo and the Fort Lauderdale A1A Half Marathon, and that they also forget about the cadence values. It would be glorious to see these two potential-fraudster spin that screw-up away.
But, most likely, they'll take the easy way out and do their best Costanza, denial.
Remember, it's not a lie, if you believe it.
"But instead you rant and race and bomb and blast and verbally dance but don't answer questions. Why?"
For the same reasons Mike Rossi, Rob Young, Dave Reading, etc didn't.
It's all following a very familiar script.
When will these people learn?, come clean and everyone will move on, keep digging and the hole gets bigger and you can't get out and eventually die a slow painful death, metaphorically speaking of course, don't want to be accused of being a hater, etc.
When will these people learn? wrote:
When will these people learn?, come clean and everyone will move on, keep digging and the hole gets bigger and you can't get out and eventually die a slow painful death, metaphorically speaking of course, don't want to be accused of being a hater, etc.
If they would have just accepted it the could have drummed up more support and cash for a second attempt. Instead they blow it up. They should fire their publicist.
[quote
Remember, it's not a lie, if you believe it.[/quote]
I think this sums it up nicely.
Karl Hungus wrote:
SeenThat wrote:If she wants support from the running community she simply needs to do is publish the data. If the data backs up her claims I'm sure she'd gain a lot of support from fellow runners. Until then she'll always be viewed as a runner of dubious pedigree and claims.
If the data looks good, then I'll gladly retract my claim that his doesn't pass the sniff test.
So all they have to do is fake the data sufficiently well, and then you'll believe?
Hollywood Studios wrote:
Karl Hungus wrote:If the data looks good, then I'll gladly retract my claim that his doesn't pass the sniff test.
So all they have to do is fake the data sufficiently well, and then you'll believe?
Maybe someone can post an example of sufficiently good data, so they will have a target to aim for. Otherwise LRC can just always ask for more, continually being unconvinced. It's important to make sure that the bias does keep moving the goal frame.
Maybe someone can post an example of sufficiently good data, so they will have a target to aim for. Otherwise LRC can just always ask for more, continually being unconvinced. It's important to make sure that the bias does keep moving the goal frame.
They don't have data and they are not able to make it up now.
And if so, nobody would believe it.
They could have had read outs from the treadmill, they had a non stop video from the event but unfortunately it disappeared.
All what is left is Dave Keighley's reputation.
the_real_Brit_1 wrote:
Quite the opposite.You have only demonstrated that you can use google...albeit out of context.
Time to give up the chirade. You know the one you pronounce like ʃəˈrÉ‘Ëd). :)
So explain to me what does a Google search look like that would find Test Match Special performed by someone unaware of the basics of cricket or even it's existence.
Darren Kavinoky wrote:
Maybe someone can post an example of sufficiently good data, so they will have a target to aim for. Otherwise LRC can just always ask for more, continually being unconvinced. It's important to make sure that the bias does keep moving the goal frame.
They don't have data and they are not able to make it up now.
And if so, nobody would believe it.
Well of course it's hard to make it up, as LRC won't say what it will accept as data. Guinness at least had *some* conditions written down, even if they were the ultimate arbiters on what constituted a "independent" witness in the technicality that prevented Amy's record from being registered.
I agree. What are the odds that LRC or FB ultra-running would have sent a indepenedent witness to the mall when Amy was setting the record, if it mattered that much? But now all they can do is complain about a lack of data that they deem necessary ex post facto?
What's odd is the Dave guy claims a medical professional was there to check her vitals twice a day. But they couldn't bring in an independent witness?
He also asks who asks (demand, some politely) for data on the record? Um... everyone. If this was a legit attempt live streamed 24-7 why were there not hourly updates in mileage with pics?
If the footage and pics of mile logs were released I'd believe the treadmill run. The 53:53... she prabably ran everyday but not the full 26.
Still a good complishment. The defensive behavior is what got the hounds released.
Lets Keep it Real wrote:
What's odd is the Dave guy claims a medical professional was there to check her vitals twice a day. But they couldn't bring in an independent witness?
Except that the medical pro couldn't count as an "valid witness", because they were performing other functions (see Guinness literature, with their example of a security guard).
Friend of 53 wrote:
There's going to be some big news in the next few days. Let's just say be prepared for egg on your faces!
The big news is going to be that Amy Hughes and Dave Keighley get arrested for misappropriating charity funds. Can't wait.
The big news is going to be that Amy Hughes and Dave Keighley get arrested for misappropriating charity funds. Can't wait.
Are you sure that is possible? I am not a lawyer.
But I know that some people are looking into the charity "The 53 foundation" right now.
http://the53foundation.co.uk/Registered Charity No. 1169380
https://mydonate.bt.com/charities/the53foundationhttps://www.facebook.com/the53foundation/The 53 Foundation
July 28 at 1:16pm ·
Obviously lots of things have been going on over last few days with Amy and her Guinness world record. We all know that's a joke!
But what is not a joke and can never be taken away from Amy Hughes is that she raised over £5000 during that challenge and today we donated over £2000 of that. We have helped a young lady pay the rest of her track chair off to enable her to get racing.
And we have also helped fund a tennis wheelchair for a guy in the GB development squad.
So all the support you have given Amy and our charity means so much to us all and we are glad to finish the week with good news.
However we will continue to fight for Amy's record. Look out for her live on sky news tomorrow at about 08:00. And keep sharing and signing the petition. #justiceforamy
ExpertKipWatcher wrote:
the_real_Brit_1 wrote:Quite the opposite.You have only demonstrated that you can use google...albeit out of context.
Time to give up the chirade. You know the one you pronounce like ʃəˈrÉ‘Ëd). :)
So explain to me what does a Google search look like that would find Test Match Special performed by someone unaware of the basics of cricket or even it's existence.
Dude, If you want to prove your Britishness do it on another thread.
It really bothers you that people don't think you are British. Hate to break it to you but there's nothing special about it.