Anyone got a time?
Anyone got a time?
I too would like to know
It doesn't matter. He is a 10.5 guy and it's all about entertainment. You're not going to see a 9.90 from him.
nigel talton 6.73i, 10.47, 21.66
low 11s
I timed it twice. 10.7h both times.
He ran 120 meters.
notrump wrote:
He ran 120 meters.
Uh, no.
I have it on VERY good authority that he ran a 9.71. The guy is REALLY FAST!!!
I had him in 10.05 hh. Slower than Rodgers but much more relaxed . Would have been a good race.
I timed him in 10.79. Start when you see the smoke from the handgun, and stop after you 'see' him cross the finish line.
did anyone else read the ESPN article over him, and cringe hard when they mentioned that he "narrowly missed the OT" (it wasn't close).
to most citizens 0.27 seconds is a very, very small amount time.
the kobe of being bad wrote:
did anyone else read the ESPN article over him, and cringe hard when they mentioned that he "narrowly missed the OT" (it wasn't close).
Jill St John 162 wrote:
to most citizens 0.27 seconds is a very, very small amount time.
the kobe of being bad wrote:did anyone else read the ESPN article over him, and cringe hard when they mentioned that he "narrowly missed the OT" (it wasn't close).
To what citizens is over a quarter of a second in a 100 not a lot? I guess if you're Russian you can always dope your way down
PrZ wrote:
Jill St John 162 wrote:to most citizens 0.27 seconds is a very, very small amount time.
To what citizens is over a quarter of a second in a 100 not a lot? I guess if you're Russian you can always dope your way down
To all (vast majority) of citizens that only watch track once every 4 years. .25 to them is probably a close race when visualizing while reading an article.
He is a necessary evil. Like Mr. Freeze in Batman. He actually generates attention for our sport.
handelandj wrote:
Anyone got a time?
Loved the guy who finished first who did the Bolt arrow shot and the guy who finished second told the interviewer that " God has plans for me" and pointed to the sky. Hilarious.
thesad troof wrote:
nigel talton 6.73i, 10.47, 21.66
Not fast by Track standards, but WAY faster than the average person. Hey he puts on a show, races fans, the thing that surprises me is he wins most of the time, I would think top local High Schoolers or people with a college track background would show up to beat him, do they screen out his competition?
PrZ wrote:
Jill St John 162 wrote:to most citizens 0.27 seconds is a very, very small amount time.
To what citizens is over a quarter of a second in a 100 not a lot? I guess if you're Russian you can always dope your way down
If only Russians would emulate American 100m runners, the absolute pinnacle of cleanliness.
Anyone have a video link of the race?