Here are my PRs
5k: 15:52
3200m: 9:39
1600m: 4:18
800m: 1:58
400m: 53.xx
I'm pretty sure my best event is the 1600m but what side of that is better?
Here are my PRs
5k: 15:52
3200m: 9:39
1600m: 4:18
800m: 1:58
400m: 53.xx
I'm pretty sure my best event is the 1600m but what side of that is better?
You are more speed oriented trust me those are fast times but the 400-1600 are the most impressive. Also, you're very well rounded which shows your talent. I ran a 15:30 5k and a 9:40 3200 very similar to you and I'm endurance based. However my 400 which I ran only once was a 56, 800 was a 2:03, and my 1600 was a 4:34
Great times but it is hard to tell. Was the 15:52 done on a XC course or a road race/track race? When I clocked 15:40 as a well-rounded runner I had PRs of:
1600m - 4:40
800m - 2:06
400m - 57
I thought I had speed..
It was a very fast course on grass. I don't know if you know what the stanford cross country course looks like. Also, I think it's crazy you ran 15:40 with a 4:40 PR! Good going!
widum boise wrote:
Great times but it is hard to tell. Was the 15:52 done on a XC course or a road race/track race? When I clocked 15:40 as a well-rounded runner I had PRs of:
1600m - 4:40
800m - 2:06
400m - 57
I thought I had speed..
Des Linden: "The entire sport" has changed since she first started running Boston.
Ryan Eiler, 3rd American man at Boston, almost out of nowhere
Am I living in the twilight zone? The Boston Marathon weather was terrible!
Matt Choi was drinking beer halfway through the Boston Marathon
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion