I went deep into the 12 steps, as deep as my personality, previous and contemporaneous learning, and character traits would allow.
Yes, anyone could find some philosophical problems including some cult-like notions. I dabbled longer than I was all-in due to skepticism and disbelief "after investigation". There is a saying in AA that those who don't get all in as devotees into this trap of "contempt prior to investigation", would be a philosophical problem, but many people shouldn't be accused of that just because they find AA lacking. Then, if you go out and live successfully without severe alcohol issues or without AA you will be told you never were a real addict in the first place, or worse they say, "we will be hereafter you go and screw your life up", "hit your bottom" or "rock bottom as I did". Then to protect themselves they say, if you can have a decent life without AA then you never really were an "alcoholic" or "one of us" Can't get much more self-serving than that. If you want to take the approach that you are the problem, not the alcohol, I think that will work, if
it's taken deep enough into your core belief for long enough. Sure some people go as just problem drinkers. My binges and other tragedies match a pretty good "drunk-a-log".
Other philosophical issues. Avoid controversy, you are like a man with no arms and no legs and will never be able to
stay sober if you don't say 1000 serenity prayers and be weak. It doesn't work and you end up with dry drunks who screw themselves and others up precisely because they never learn to move in, around, through, controversy in a functional pattern that humans need.
My dad died of drinking when he was 46 that will be the biggest contributing factor to early deaths for all my brothers,
My sisters have been obese and had bulimia. I am not different from the ones who stayed in the 12 steps.