To me it seems that few women could be considered "athletic," beyond 22.
Most have quit sports by then. Yes, a few women start running in their 30s but are not what anyone would call athletic, they are merely runners.
Discus or discuss.
Yes but they are often in that 18-22 range.
Ath girls everywhere wrote:
From what I see, and all I can do is "see", being 58 and married, is that there are a lot of women in their twenties who are into yoga/crossfit/climbing/running obstacle courses, etc. They are at least as relatively as athletic as the average "I'm not a hobby jogger" that posts here.
Women may not be totally angry at men but they do become much more fearful because they have been burned in the past. Men are that way also because we become more afraid of taking chances. Unless you are former Minnesota Vikings coach Dennis Green that is.
Melvin Treebender wrote:
There are women that look good in their forties but they are rare.
We are supposed to act unemotional and non-reactive! Hey if I see one like that and they appear to be unmarried it can be hard to act as if they are a dime a dozen.
It's too bad I didn't know that was the secret to getting women when there were women to be got in my 20's. In those days a dream girl came around every time you turned the corner.
Youth is wasted on the young. So now all the guys live with women and any women with potential are dried up and p' od at men for the rest of their lives by age 30!