BREAKING: London Car Runs Down Pedestrians..Yes. Again...

Lol dwumpf wrote:

They're all accomplished intellectuals who know that even though they film the show in perhaps the biggest terrorist target in the world, they have a better chance of getting struck by lightening.

Your post doesn't make sense. Can you explain what the chances of getting struck by lightning (or any other event) has to do with whether we should care about the chances of a terrorist attack (or any other event)? Isn't it possible to worry about multiple things simultaneously?

Police say it was a white man. Surprise surprise. People keep telling me that white men are not all violent people, that you can't judge a group by the radical minority, but I don't believe them. If whites weren't violent people we wouldn't keep seeing attacks like this week after week. Plowing cars into people, shooting up congressmen and MP's, shooting up schools full of children, murdering innocent Sikhs. Ever notice how the white community never speaks out against these people? Violence is part of their culture, they'll never give it up.

The truth hurts doesn't it?

Also in today's news we have a guy attacking a London police officer while shouting Allahu Akbar:

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/06/19/paddington-station-man-arrested-after-attacking-officer/

And not to forget a guy driving his van full of explosives and guns into a police car in Paris:

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/06/19/suspected-attacker-drives-car-into-police-vehicle-in-champs-elysees-police-say.html

Yes, I'm being sarcastic wrote:

Police say it was a white man. Surprise surprise. People keep telling me that white men are not all violent people, that you can't judge a group by the radical minority, but I don't believe them. If whites weren't violent people we wouldn't keep seeing attacks like this week after week. Plowing cars into people, shooting up congressmen and MP's, shooting up schools full of children, murdering innocent Sikhs. Ever notice how the white community never speaks out against these people?

The white community speaks out against these people all the time. Maybe you should visit other news outlets than the hateful violent loving leftist ones ?

Huii wrote:

Lol dwumpf wrote:

They're all accomplished intellectuals who know that even though they film the show in perhaps the biggest terrorist target in the world, they have a better chance of getting struck by lightening.

Your post doesn't make sense. Can you explain what the chances of getting struck by lightning (or any other event) has to do with whether we should care about the chances of a terrorist attack (or any other event)? Isn't it possible to worry about multiple things simultaneously?

His point was that fear of a particular negative event ocurring to you should be in direct proportion to the probability of that event ocurring.

Accordingly, most people should be more concerned about being injured or killed walking down a flight of stairs then being injured or killed by a terrorist.

Sooner or later their gonna get smart. They get their hands on some test tube

full of some biological crap like Anthrax. Heck they can attach it to some cheap drone, they buy at a local store. Fly it into the side of some tall building, in the middle of big city. Maybe into a big stadium where a big athletic event is on. I really hope I am wrong.

than being injured or killed.

Europe on the brink of war wrote:

Also in today's news we have a guy attacking a London police officer while shouting Allahu Akbar:

And not to forget a guy driving his van full of explosives and guns into a police car in Paris:

Watching CNN International in Germany and there has not been a single mention of the attack on the London police officer and just a brief statement on the Paris attack in the news ticker. Nonstop coverage of the "terrorism" attack against the mosque, however.

This must be what it's like to live in North Korea and have the "news" be nothing but propaganda. Welcome to Germany, circa 1937!

So they are covering the same stories as markschultz. Coincidence?!?! Doubtful.

Martel wrote:

Why do you bother. wrote:

Why would it suck to be in the UK? By any statistic the UK is one of the safest places on the planet. I live in London and it is a fantastic place, these incidents have not made any difference to life here.

Why don't you p*ss off to the Daily Mail instead?

Lol, I was on the tube a couple of weeks ago after the Manchester bomb and BEFORE the london bridge attack and the fear in the carriage was palpable. I'm white and had a small backpack on and yet people were eying me nervously.

.

That was just fear that you were going to talk to them, or even worse, try to sit next to them.

Happens on public transport all over the UK.

Lol dwumpf wrote:

It's easier to get tax cuts through without them noticing.

Would that be like a bad thing?

I'm telling yaz, it was a Cockney name a Jones that broke them bones.

remember the basics, please. wrote:

Why do you bother. wrote:

Why would it suck to be in the UK? By any statistic the UK is one of the safest places on the planet. I live in London and it is a fantastic place, these incidents have not made any difference to life here.

Why don't you p*ss off to the Daily Mail instead?

Just remember - the key idea on these boards is a) the UK and Sweden are are rivalling Syria in terms of danger, b) all muslims are out to cause trouble, and c) U-S-A, U-S-A, U-S-A!!!

Most importantly of all, you're not allowed to base any of your opinions on facts or any source other than Breitbart.

+1

What are the odds? wrote:

His point was that fear of a particular negative event ocurring to you should be in direct proportion to the probability of that event ocurring.

Accordingly, most people should be more concerned about being injured or killed walking down a flight of stairs then being injured or killed by a terrorist.

So then he is arguing that we should do something about Muslims? Harm due to lightning strikes would be much higher if we weren't trained to avoid them. The same with walking down stairs.

Furthermore, you are looking at voting from a selfish viewpoint. Many of us do not only vote for what benefits ourselves. Some of our vote is about benefitting others. For example, I do not live in a border state so I don't suffer from a significant amount of illegal immigration. However, I have compassion, empathy, and sympathy for the voters that do live in such states. The same with immigrating Muslims from countries that have a Muslim problem (not all Muslim countries are the same).

Voting is about everyone not just what benefits or harms you directly.

libs love violence wrote:

Vivalarepublica wrote:

Sucks when it doesn't fit your narrative.

Seems that anybody is capable of random violence and terrorism?

Seems like you're happy now. Congrats!

No, I'm not. We all know what freak out would occur if this yahoo was Muslim.

Random violence as a response to random violence creates...wait for it...more random violence! I wish these things wouldn't happen, but they do.

Now let's go back to just heaping labels on people and seeing them as subhuman. That always works.

The hero has been identified: Darren Osborne, father of four.

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/06/19/finsbury-park-attack-suspect-named-as-cardiff-resident-darren-osborne/

After WWIII he will receive his well-deserved military decoration.

Now his children will be without a father and possibly the same for the children of those he ran into. And what good did his action serve? I can understand sacrificing yourself to your comrades in war. He attacked innocent people in support of a race war.

xcvxvxcvx wrote:

He attacked innocent people

Salafists innocent? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

enemy salafist warrior down wrote:

The hero has been identified: Darren Osborne, father of four.

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/06/19/finsbury-park-attack-suspect-named-as-cardiff-resident-darren-osborne/

After WWIII he will receive his well-deserved military decoration.

If you were going to give the UK an enema, Cardiff is where you would install the hose.