Unreal. It would suck to be in the UK now.
Unreal. It would suck to be in the UK now.
Probably a Muslim
But Trump is the problem...right?
Interesting twist to this story.
It turns out that the attacker is a White male and it occurred near a mosque. Retaliation perhaps?
Perhaps in 125 years time, all of these terrorist attacks will be labeled Jihad the Ripper.
markschultz25 wrote:
Interesting twist to this story.
It turns out that the attacker is a White male and it occurred near a mosque. Retaliation perhaps?
I doubt that's true
markschultz25 wrote:
It turns out that the attacker is a White male and it occurred near a mosque. Retaliation perhaps?
If true that would means that this is not terrorism.
Thank goodness for that.
markschultz25 wrote:
Interesting twist to this story.
It turns out that the attacker is a White male and it occurred near a mosque. Retaliation perhaps?
markschultz25 wrote:
Interesting twist to this story.
It turns out that the attacker is a White male and it occurred near a mosque. Retaliation perhaps?
You must really be a sad and lonely person.
markschultz25 wrote:
Unreal. It would suck to be in the UK now.
Why would it suck to be in the UK? By any statistic the UK is one of the safest places on the planet. I live in London and it is a fantastic place, these incidents have not made any difference to life here.
Why don't you p*ss off to the Daily Mail instead?
Why do you bother. wrote:
markschultz25 wrote:Unreal. It would suck to be in the UK now.
Why would it suck to be in the UK? By any statistic the UK is one of the safest places on the planet. I live in London and it is a fantastic place, these incidents have not made any difference to life here.
Why don't you p*ss off to the Daily Mail instead?
Just remember - the key idea on these boards is a) the UK and Sweden are are rivalling Syria in terms of danger, b) all muslims are out to cause trouble, and c) U-S-A, U-S-A, U-S-A!!!
Most importantly of all, you're not allowed to base any of your opinions on facts or any source other than Breitbart.
Why do you bother. wrote:
markschultz25 wrote:Unreal. It would suck to be in the UK now.
Why would it suck to be in the UK? By any statistic the UK is one of the safest places on the planet. I live in London and it is a fantastic place, these incidents have not made any difference to life here.
Why don't you p*ss off to the Daily Mail instead?
Yeah, terrorism is part and parcel of living in a big city as Sadiq says....well living in a city with lots of muslims in it.
Lol, I was on the tube a couple of weeks ago after the Manchester bomb and BEFORE the london bridge attack and the fear in the carriage was palpable. I'm white and had a small backpack on and yet people were eying me nervously.
Tourism to London will be hit hard just as it has been in Paris. The Louvre in Paris saw TWO MILLION fewer visits last year at a cost of £10 million.
Two wrote:
markschultz25 wrote:Interesting twist to this story.
It turns out that the attacker is a White male and it occurred near a mosque. Retaliation perhaps?
You must really be a sad and lonely person.
LOL. Idiot hating markschultz25 so much he won't hear the truth.
Cars should be banned outright from every major city worldwide to improve safety for the residents (they kill more people than wars each year), to give more space inside cities, and to dramatically reduce pollution and the environmental and health problems associtated with this.
markschultz25 wrote:
Unreal. It would suck to be in the UK now.
Not really
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rateWhy do you bother. wrote:
markschultz25 wrote:Unreal. It would suck to be in the UK now.
Why would it suck to be in the UK? By any statistic the UK is one of the safest places on the planet. I live in London and it is a fantastic place, these incidents have not made any difference to life here.
Why don't you p*ss off to the Daily Mail instead?
It's not completely their fault. There has been a concerted effort by elites for about three decades to keep the masses focused on events that make them emotional, like terrorism, even if it has zero tangible impact on their lives. It's easier to get tax cuts through without them noticing.
Do you think members of fox news' "the five" are afraid of terrorism? Hell no. They're all accomplished intellectuals who know that even though they film the show in perhaps the biggest terrorist target in the world, they have a better chance of getting struck by lightening. But they've done a masterful job of convincing people in Kentucky that 60% of their night should be dedicated to worrying about Muslims.
markschultz25 wrote:
Interesting twist to this story.
It turns out that the attacker is a White male and it occurred near a mosque. Retaliation perhaps?
Sucks when it doesn't fit your narrative.
Seems that anybody is capable of random violence and terrorism?
Vivalarepublica wrote:
markschultz25 wrote:Interesting twist to this story.
It turns out that the attacker is a White male and it occurred near a mosque. Retaliation perhaps?
Sucks when it doesn't fit your narrative.
Seems that anybody is capable of random violence and terrorism?
Seems like you're happy now. Congrats!
Lol dwumpf wrote:
Why do you bother. wrote:Why would it suck to be in the UK? By any statistic the UK is one of the safest places on the planet. I live in London and it is a fantastic place, these incidents have not made any difference to life here.
Why don't you p*ss off to the Daily Mail instead?
It's not completely their fault. There has been a concerted effort by elites for about three decades to keep the masses focused on events that make them emotional, like terrorism, even if it has zero tangible impact on their lives. It's easier to get tax cuts through without them noticing.
Do you think members of fox news' "the five" are afraid of terrorism? Hell no. They're all accomplished intellectuals who know that even though they film the show in perhaps the biggest terrorist target in the world, they have a better chance of getting struck by lightening. But they've done a masterful job of convincing people in Kentucky that 60% of their night should be dedicated to worrying about Muslims.
I will of course edit my statement to say that the liberal trash news sources (CNN, MSNBC, etc) are no better - and at times much worse.
libs love violence wrote:
Vivalarepublica wrote:Sucks when it doesn't fit your narrative.
Seems that anybody is capable of random violence and terrorism?
Seems like you're happy now. Congrats!
There was nothing happy or positive about his post.
I'm sure he enjoys seeing the scum of letsrun eat their hateful words, but no one is happy about this.