NIKE shoes SUCK

Nike makes jihabs with their swoosh on it and pushes these things in the current state of things in this country. Throw in the "assumption" that Oregon is using athletes as pharmacological experiments and you have two reasons not to support this crap company.

I'd rather race in Kmart flats than Nike's best.

Nikesucks wrote:

Okay usually for running I have an Asics shoe and it's great never made me injuries or anything. Note I have high arch feet so it's important to have the proper cushioned shoe. However recently I bought the Nike roshe one's just to walk around in and I've noticed they feel like your walking on bricks. Anyway I've been walking a lot in those shoes and I noticed an ache in my arch from walking in those shows. However recently now the top of my foot hurts only when walking sometimes and it's swollen but I can still run in my advice without pain... SO any thoughts on what this is and treatment options?? Also can I continue running?

Also Nike shoes suck and it cost me this dumb problem...

My goodness, I sincerely hope that English is not your first language.

Nikesucks wrote:

Okay usually for running I have an Asics shoe and it's great never made me injuries or anything. Note I have high arch feet so it's important to have the proper cushioned shoe. However recently I bought the Nike roshe one's just to walk around in and I've noticed they feel like your walking on bricks. Anyway I've been walking a lot in those shoes and I noticed an ache in my arch from walking in those shows. However recently now the top of my foot hurts only when walking sometimes and it's swollen but I can still run in my advice without pain... SO any thoughts on what this is and treatment options?? Also can I continue running?

Also Nike shoes suck and it cost me this dumb problem...

Roshe 😂😂😂

Buy some Boosts for walking around in, pleb. You deserve it.

My analysis... I probably wore 25 of the first 30 Pegasus shoes. Subtle change each year. Stayed under $100 until about #30. For some reason they decided to forgoe the reliable forefoot support that was such a standard aspect of their shoes. They try to sell the curent lacing system as a support mechanism but it simply doesn't work. I see runners of all ages and abilities that have the lateral (big toe) side of their foot sliding over the midsole, offering little or no forefoot support. This is true in the Pegasus, Vomeros and the Structures. The Fly and Lunar series should not be allowed to be called running shoes. At $200 the Air Max is so cost prohibitive I doubt the people in Beaverton are worrying too much about that one. Loved the Cortez, Roadrunners, LDVs, Elites, Waffle trainers, Tailwinds, Terra TCs, Bermudas, Air Max...

but I think I'm going to have to move on.

To each their own. I have really rigid high arches and only wear Nike-have worn them for 10 years and haven't had issues. Maybe you shouldn't buy the Roshe..I haven't even heard of that shoe. I stick with Pegasus and Vomero and both have worked well for me.

Jko99 wrote:

To each their own. I have really rigid high arches and only wear Nike-have worn them for 10 years and haven't had issues. Maybe you shouldn't buy the Roshe..I haven't even heard of that shoe. I stick with Pegasus and Vomero and both have worked well for me.

That's because the Roshe is a basic bitch $60 "running-inspired" casual sneaker. They sell it at like discount apparel or outlet stores. It isn't fit for walking let alone running in.

I have some hybrid Roshe/Free/Cortez shoes right now that I wear a lot at work, and they're fantastic. They've been the shoe I grab the most lately.

Nike athletes won the most medals at the Olympics than any other brand. /END

love the roshe hybrids wrote:

I have some hybrid Roshe/Free/Cortez shoes right now that I wear a lot at work, and they're fantastic. They've been the shoe I grab the most lately.

Nike athletes won the most medals at the Olympics than any other brand. /END

No kidding. Guess what? "Supplements" work.

Ian Cooper wrote:

Nike makes jihabs with their swoosh on it and pushes these things in the current state of things in this country. Throw in the "assumption" that Oregon is using athletes as pharmacological experiments and you have two reasons not to support this crap company.

I'd rather race in Kmart flats than Nike's best.

What is the hell is a jihab?

Ian Cooper wrote:

No kidding. Guess what? "Supplements" work.

Also Nike tends to sponsor the best athletes simply because of the status and the monetary bonuses. Nike athletes don't win the most medals, athletes that win medals are targeted for contracts and sponsorships by Nike

2scher wrote:

Also Nike tends to sponsor the best athletes simply because of the status and the monetary bonuses. Nike athletes don't win the most medals, athletes that win medals are targeted for contracts and sponsorships by Nike

No, they were Nike athletes when they won the medals. Nike wins the most medals, period. You see Hoka athletes winning medals? Asics? Brooks? Kudos to Nike for valuing performance and paying athletes what they are worth. Nike has more money to put into development and quality control on their products too.

Additionally, if you're at that level, you're drug tested, and no way are you going to risk your career and livelihood by taking GNC type of supplements unless you're stupid.

Turn your gdahmmed brain on and dont buy shoes from payless

Ian Cooper wrote:

Nike makes jihabs with their swoosh on it and pushes these things in the current state of things in this country. Throw in the "assumption" that Oregon is using athletes as pharmacological experiments and you have two reasons not to support this crap company.

I'd rather race in Kmart flats than Nike's best.

What’s wrong with you? For the love of god. Stop the racism.

nike roshe is a budget shoe, its the kind of thing you buy if you're doing about 10 miles a week or xc but don't really care to be there. This doesn't mean other nike shoes are good, just that those are bottom of the barrel.