Cmon dude wrote:
I am going to show a few stats that I posted earlier this week. Feel free to go back and look at them.
Posted on Tuesday 6/20 at 3:58 pm central time
83.22 miles in 6 hrs 9 min 54 sec, 13.50 mph
Posted on Wed 6/21 at 6:30 pm central time
69.81 miles in 4 hrs 49 min 34 sec, 14.46 mph
Posted on Thur 6/22 at 10:03 pm central time
74.67 miles in 6 hrs 18 min 22 sec, 11.84
The rest of this I'm going to spell out very clearly, so simple that even a lawyer like Darren will be able to grasp it.
Today (Fri 6/23) at 9:51 am central time I posted that they left at 9:06 central time. At 10:38 am central time I posted some splits, and also noted that day's starting position of 83:30:07 and 988.67 miles.
At 10:52 am central time I noted that they had an hour where they averaged 17.1 mph.
At 12:08 pm central time I posted that the contact with the GPS tracking had been lost. I also noted that the GPS stats were frozen at 91:46:23 and 1025.9 miles. I also noted that the stats at the time GPS was lost was 37.2 miles in 2 hrs 16 min and 16 sec, which is an average of 16.4 mph.
Since they started at 9:06 am central time and the GPS froze 2 hrs 16 min later, that means that it was 11:22 am central time when contact was lost.
At 2:29 pm central time / 3:29 eastern time Darren tweeted that they traveled 90 miles. Now let's do the math.
GPS froze when they had traveled 37.2 miles
3 hrs and 7 min later Darren claims that they went 90 miles, or 52.8 additional miles after the GPS froze.
52.8 miles in 3 hr 7 min = 16.94 mph, and that is after averaging 16.4 for the first 37.2 miles.
Now let us recap:
Tue 6/20 83.22 miles at 13.50 mph
Wed 6/21 69.81 miles at 14.46 mph
Thur 6/22 74.67 miles at 11.84 mph
Fri 6/23 90 miles in 5 hrs 23 min = 16.7 mph
Suddenly when the GPS goes out they can go 90 miles at 16.7 mph????? I am also assuming when Darren tweeted (2:29 central, 3:29 eastern) that he did so immediately after they finished.
Bullsh**. I call bullsh**. Darren, you are a lying sack of sh**. That did not happen.
To those who questioned me earlier and thought that I might be a troll, I can assure you that I am not. Everything that I have posted, including the calls to the stores, is factual. I find letsrun can be a very useful tool to keep up and follow the sport of running, and it can also can be very entertaining. With the Internet it is nice to be able to follow track and cross country so closely as opposed to the early and mid 70's when I competed. I did pretty good back then (4:10.8 mile, D3), and my son was even better, especially at the longer stuff. Running has been a constant thread in my life, and it is maddening to see cheating dopers, or scammers like this event we are all following.