Mr. Obvious wrote:
Ha, ha, ha. Yes, you are diligently and earnestly seeking evidence...
rekrunner wrote:In my search to look for evidence of EPO working at the top, I look at the ones running the fastest times, notably faster than pre-EPO records.
Yes. This is too funny. Rekrunner, have you explained to Ross Tucker how he got his numbers all wrong, as they are all coincidental, and that there is no reason to suspect the old world records like he does:
"a whole bunch of them [old word records] dating back to the 1980s that were arguably aided by steroids at a time when out of competition testing was non-existent, and then you’ll see a host of them dating to the late 1990s and early 2000s that are equally suspect because that’s when EPO use (and later blood doping) was rampant in the sport, also without adequate testing."
If you have some time, rekrunner, tell him, or us, why he is so very very wrong to state:
"I hope that the explanation I provided above, regarding the fossilization of world records, has shown this to be true – the steroid era prior to Out of competition testing, and the EPO era prior to an EPO test are certainly highly suspicious.
So yes, pre-2005 must be viewed with less trust than post-2005."
Starting with that there is no steroid era, and that there is no EPO era, and if they were, it didn't matter because doping doesn't help. Tucker apparently doesn't understand coincidences as you do, rekrunner.