Jiggery-pokery wrote:
From what I've heard, the London is legitimate. Bournemouth? Not sure about yet.
Wrong again Terrie.
You've still ignored ALL my questions.
Let's see the Tom Tom data you sent to Scott.
You will have to show it to Hugh, and oh dear, tampering with data to scam the head of London ain't cool.
Where were YOU during London marathon?
Did YOU see him at the start? On the course? Just at the finish?
Why wasn't he wearing the chip AT ALL?
Why did you say on here in April that "the chip might of been faulty, who knows".
Yet on Ultrarunning Community a few days ago you said, "in May 2016 we told London the chip was broken and faulty".
So two different stories there.
And now I see there never WAS a chip on his shoe!
Nothing to say about why Dave was removed from the Bournemouth results?
Why would that happen if he didn't cheat?
You are aware his recorded split times were impossible, hence why he was kicked out and disqualified.
Don't have anything to say? I feel so sad you ignore ALL my questions...