Potentially Suspicious Runner To Run 836 Miles in 9 Days for "Charity"

agree wrote:

larry solderstein wrote:

Not surprised that Scott got an email in a rather rude tone given the tone of those on this thread.

Agree. There's one thing reporting this guy and another thing harassing people doing their job.

What if he sent London false info that supported his claim. How can they throw out someone without 100% evidence.

Also missing split times does not 100% mean someone has cheated ( I.e. It could mean his chip did not work.).

Either way no need to troll people, just cos you have a lot of spare time!

The people working for London marathon are salaried, not volunteers.

So they are simply being asked to do their JOB.

Several people sent them evidence he missed all the chip mats and on no photos at all until the finish.

They ignored this time and time again.

So people kept submitting the evidence again.

This is not hassling- it's getting people to do the job they are PAID to do.

Nor is it TROLLING.

Every time a person asks a question these days they are automatically called "a troll".

Pathetic.

The evidence comes from the fact he crossed NO mats and is on NO photos from the start to mile 25, and cannot have produced Garmin data that matched the time he claimed, as he simply did NOT run the marathon.

Unlucky guy Reading isn't he. - All chip mats failed to record his time apart from the finish, and all cameras broke when he ran past.........

Scott Overall is personal friends with Mo Farah and Dave Reading said that he was inspired by Mo Farah to do the running scam. So Mo Farah is a common connection between them.

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2012/aug/11/london-2012-scott-overall-mo-farah?newsfeed=true

WTF is going on wrote:

WTF.

HOW can he possibly have provided evidence he ran the marathon when he didn't?

No splits. No photos of him. And he couldn't possibly have provided Garmin data to match the exact time, unless Reading or one of his cronies created fake data? Surely Scott would be able to suss faked data?

I really want to know what this "evidence" was he supplied.

I'm hoping Scott Overall replies to my request for the evidence. But my fear is that Scott is either an idiot or corrupt. Prove me wrong, Scott. I'm waiting.

BS Superman wrote:

WTF is going on wrote:

WTF.

HOW can he possibly have provided evidence he ran the marathon when he didn't?

No splits. No photos of him. And he couldn't possibly have provided Garmin data to match the exact time, unless Reading or one of his cronies created fake data? Surely Scott would be able to suss faked data?

I really want to know what this "evidence" was he supplied.

I'm hoping Scott Overall replies to my request for the evidence. But my fear is that Scott is either an idiot or corrupt. Prove me wrong, Scott. I'm waiting.

They were so quick to boot out that lad Lee, who was INNOCENT, yet won't boot out this scammer.

That young lad had a faulty chip at the start and 5k, then the rest was okay, but they kicked him out.

Then Derek at marathon investigators got people together to find photo proof he ran it and they gave him his result back.

So why so harsh on this young lad, yet all clubbing together to protect Reading?

He's a nobody. He doesn't know Mo, just likes him.

I will ask Derek for help depending on what reply we get....

BS Superman wrote:

I will ask Derek for help depending on what reply we get....

It's likely they won't tell us what this "evidence" was that Reading provided.

Most likely doctored watch data. He knows enough dodgy people who could fix this.

What other "evidence" could you provide? A letter from your mom swearing you did it?

It's been over a full day since I asked Scott Overall for the evidence and he did not respond even though he was very quick in responding to my initial email with the missing time splits and photos. I also sent Scott the RAFA blog link where Dave Reading claims he finished the London Marathon 2016 a full hour faster than what even the London Marathon website shows. I also wrote that even coach Neil Featherby said that neither he or any of his runners saw Dave Reading on the course.

If Scott Overall does not respond by tomorrow, I'm declaring him complicit with this scam and will be making huge noise out of this.

You know everyone is laughing at you!

I've done some investigating and I reckon you get laid a lot. However I'm still working on any evidence to back this up!

Got any false garmin data to help me out?

Hey duck you. I've been laid... Er... duck you!

BS Superman wrote:

Hey duck you. I've been laid... Er... duck you!

Note that the above was Terrie or a troll impersonating me. I'm actually a Tibetan monk.

Guess I will start using my registered user name in this thread now that Terrie or one of her trolls is impersonating me.

Note for other sleuths, I am the one that is emailing Scott Overall right now asking for the evidence and investigating.

Scam_Watcheroo wrote:

Guess I will start using my registered user name in this thread now that Terrie or one of her trolls is impersonating me.

Note for other sleuths, I am the one that is emailing Scott Overall right now asking for the evidence and investigating.

Hope you have some success, this is now getting really smelly, could be time for the Brojo's to get involved before Derek at Marathon Investigation steals all the thunder.

Does anyone know Scott Overall and what sort of a person he is.

Scott, if you're reading this please show the evidence Reading provided you with, if it's legitimate what's the problem?, LM has provided the evidence when disqualifying someone, so why not now for Reading to prove his innocence?, a few LetsRun trolls and sleuths shouldn't worry you or Dave.

BS Superman wrote:

It's been over a full day since I asked Scott Overall for the evidence and he did not respond even though he was very quick in responding to my initial email with the missing time splits and photos. I also sent Scott the RAFA blog link where Dave Reading claims he finished the London Marathon 2016 a full hour faster than what even the London Marathon website shows. I also wrote that even coach Neil Featherby said that neither he or any of his runners saw Dave Reading on the course.

If Scott Overall does not respond by tomorrow, I'm declaring him complicit with this scam and will be making huge noise out of this.

Scott IS dodgy i am sure.

I sent all the evidence to Tom at Richmond Running Festival, who is involved with organising London. He said he had passed it onto the London marathon office. But weeks went by and still the result hadn't been removed.

Next thing, i get a private facebook message from Scott, saying e-mail HIM the evidence.

I replied to his facebook message with all the evidence, but he said he was refusing to accept it unless i copied it to his e-mail, which seemed ridiculous, as he HAD the info, so why send it AGAIN to the SAME person?

When I asked why he wanted a repeated message he just blocked me.

VERY shady.

It's clear Reading cheated and clear there CANNOT be evidence he ran this.

Hey BS... wrote:

You know everyone is laughing at you!

No luv, we are all laughing at YOU, you slapper, and your lying cheating fraudster husband.

Sad benefits breeder

Not to worry, I already have plans in motion outside of this thread....

I thought this thread had long died after Terrie deleted everything and that you were just incompetent in emailing someone. How wrong I was.

Scam_Watcheroo wrote:

Not to worry, I already have plans in motion outside of this thread....

I thought this thread had long died after Terrie deleted everything and that you were just incompetent in emailing someone. How wrong I was.

Good. What's baffling is that he is a total nobody, so why would people want to defend and protect him?

He's a crap runner and not even popular.

With someone like Rob Young you could at least see WHY people were defending him, as he was likeable if you met him and not a bad runner.

But Reading has NOTHING going for him.

There is still much to do. Don't forget all that charity money that disappeared from the other events they put on - Terrie only donated £50 of that.

And what happened to the 5 grand from his "sub 3:30" marathon?

Terrie deleting stuff is irrelevant as screen shots were taken.

Bullshit, she's a wonderful person, just check out her latest Facebook Timeline photos.

whatever happens dave will be getting very closely watched from now on

so dave bring it on