Potentially Suspicious Runner To Run 836 Miles in 9 Days for "Charity"

Dave's gone one better than this old chip wearing 74yo too:

("technical error", lol.)

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2610118/Pensioner-recorded-time-second-half-London-Marathon-just-seven-minutes-slower-Paula-Radcliffe-insists-DIDNT-cheat.html

of course its genuine and its freely available for anybody to see.

all you have to do is get on a plane and go have a cup of tea with Terrie and she'll show it to you.

the Readings/Shinglers will even pay for the trip.

...i think she must be lonely.

Terri and Dave have obviously never grasped the concept of irony. Alleging that they've been cyberbullied by attempting to cyberbully someone themselves, it would seem :)

Surely you are not suggesting that someone actually called Baz has helped expose these charlatans so they called the troll doll Baz just to troll him, whilst complaining about bullying?

The Other Ultraboy wrote:

Surely you are not suggesting that someone actually called Baz has helped expose these charlatans so they called the troll doll Baz just to troll him, whilst complaining about bullying?

I took it as the masters of wit that they are they decided that they would invent a character called Baz who personifies trolls. The problem they have had from the start is actually understanding that a troll is not someone who outs cheating on the internet. A troll is defined here

So if we had decided to invent a whole load of stuff with the intent of picking on an individual then there would be some merit to this - but this isn't the case as no evidence has been forthcoming to for example explain the Bournemouth Marathon DQ

The Other Ultraboy wrote:

Surely you are not suggesting that someone actually called Baz has helped expose these charlatans so they called the troll doll Baz just to troll him, whilst complaining about bullying?

The thought had never crossed my mind, until you posted that. But now you come to mention it...

Terrie Reading epitomizes the internet troll, as demonstrated by this post that she made:

Bunch of lying wankers wrote:

Who the feck cares it's a marathon, maybe he got it wrong, maybe he exaggerated a bit, maybe he's timing chip really didn't work like many others didn't on that day. Have you checked every single runner? I doubt it! You should, you to seem to all have a lot of time on your hands. Go see to your wife's maybe you'll feel better! Learn to read! It was an attempt! Attempt! Attempt! Look up the word attempt! And now it's not, he can do what he likes and certainly has no need to answer your questions, or to prove any thing to the Likes of you!

Troll spotter wrote:

Terrie Reading epitomizes the internet troll, as demonstrated by this post that she made:

Bunch of lying wankers wrote:

Who the feck cares it's a marathon, maybe he got it wrong, maybe he exaggerated a bit, maybe he's timing chip really didn't work like many others didn't on that day. Have you checked every single runner? I doubt it! You should, you to seem to all have a lot of time on your hands. Go see to your wife's maybe you'll feel better! Learn to read! It was an attempt! Attempt! Attempt! Look up the word attempt! And now it's not, he can do what he likes and certainly has no need to answer your questions, or to prove any thing to the Likes of you!

Yes, she is totally unaware SHE is the troll and bully!

I asked the page this simple police question -

John O'Groats to Lands End 2018 Ridiculously Long Run and Ride Challenge

236 people like this

Community

Hi

Re this LEJOG and raising money.

He mentioned someone was giving 5 grand to the charity if he went sub 3:30 at London marathon. Who was that? Nicky at Mattressman I presume? Can't see it added to the charity money pages?

Cheers.

John O'Groats to Lands End 2018 Ridiculously Long Run and Ride Challenge

Thanks for messaging us. We apolagise but we are unable to respond to private messages at this time. Thank you

--------------------

Then I was blocked. Something to hide Terrie? People can't ask a civil question?

Where's the 5 grand Terrie?

You will need to explain to the benefits agency why you stole it as you should have declared receiving this payment.

Thanks for the internet troll definition, Dave and Terrie also fit the non-internet troll definition, they've trolled:

Prince Harry, Duncan the War Hero, Andrew the WWTW representative, Neil the non-coach, Joe the Driver, Scott the London Marathon representative, their sponsors, etc, etc, etc, etc.

Also, they've sown discord, lied, cheated, started arguments, upset people, been inflammatory, extraneous, provoking, disruptive, etc, etc, etc, etc all the things that trolls do, online and off.

When I see that "Baz the troll having a lovely ride with Dave in the sunshine." type stuff I actually cringe and feel embarrassed for them.

They live in Hockering, a small village of about 700 people, surely they realise people there feel the same and are laughing behind their backs at their childishly silly antics and know what they are. FMD, according to Scam_Watcheroo in his Google report even Terrie's mother has had a gutful. You've gotta feel for the family.

I have downloaded in of the race photos from the website and there's a couple of points to note...

1. Dave Reading is not wearing a timing chip on his trainers.

2. There are what appears to be, some of the wires that are used to secure a chip to the runners shoe on attached to his right shoe.

What does this tell me...

1. The timing chip may of fallen off when the wire became loose.

2. Dave Reading cleverly linked the wire under his laces 'just in case' he was photographed so he had the excuse it fell off.

The likely explanation has to be #1...Dave and Terry have not shown any evidence that they are clever enough to this through to the level of #2. Therefore, I must conclude that Dave's time of 04:19:38 in the 2016 London Marathon stands as a legitimate time.

I will post the links to the photos later this evening!

I would be interested to see what you found. I assume you bought some of the MarathonFotos for Dave near the finish line of the London Marathon? Did you also look at the photos of Dave near mile 9 when he was beside runner 26715?

It can be seen that Dave is also not wearing a chip on his shoes at mile 9. If he legitimately lost the chip during the race, we would at least have seen Dave register a chip time crossing the start line.

BUT, both Dave and Terrie Reading have repeatedly asserted that Dave's timing chip failed to register times, not that they lost it.

And I don't think they are as dumb as they look. They have scammed a lot of people in the past, not just in running.

I think a malfunctioning chip that failed to register at any mat, even the start which subsequently fell off by mile 9 is stretching credulity past breaking point. Fell off before the start? No, I'm not buying that.

YorkieCoach, I've got to assume you're trolling, sorry mate, 0/10 for you, love to see the better quality photos though, then you'll get a 5/10.

One possibility that was discussed way back near the beginning of this thread is that Dave Reading did actually run all of the London Marathon 2016 but messed up the cheating to get his 3:12 time by crossing the start line an hour after the race began with his timing chip, thinking that the timing mat at the start line was still on. However, the start line timing mat gets turned off after the start so Dave didn't get the start time he needed to record, explaining why he ended up getting a 4:19 instead because London Marathon gave him the gun time for the start time. So still cheating by Dave and Terrie, just incompetent cheating.

This can all be cleared up by Hugh at LM giving us the results of his investigation.

Terrie said the chip was definitely faulty. She said it was on his shoe but was faulty.

She said recently that in May 2016 she told London marathon that the chip was most definitely faulty.

However......in one of her recent "lying wanker" posts she said "maybe the chip was faulty, who knows".

So she forgot she had already told London the chip WAS definitely faulty.

Then I noticed he wasn't wearing one at all!

He's so dim I doubt he would attach the wires guessing we would examine photos. Might just be old wires from another race. Sometimes when the chip is snipped off the wires stay wrapped to your lace.

ExpertKipWatcher wrote:

I think a malfunctioning chip that failed to register at any mat, even the start which subsequently fell off by mile 9 is stretching credulity past breaking point. Fell off before the start? No, I'm not buying that.

Yes, clearly there was no chip. His start time was logged as 10 am and two seconds, which is clearly a manual entry from London.

Scott said he had seen TomTom evidence, but as Terrie refuses to show us, you have to doubt that.

Plus if there WAS TomTom data, why is Huge taking so long?

He never wore the chip and tried to blag a sub 3:30.

Then had to accept the 4:19 when the scam went wrong. But he's just not capable of a 4:19 so he must have cut the course. Probably at half way where runners double back and you can jump the barrier.

Scam_Watcheroo wrote:

One possibility that was discussed way back near the beginning of this thread is that Dave Reading did actually run all of the London Marathon 2016 but messed up the cheating to get his 3:12 time by crossing the start line an hour after the race began with his timing chip, thinking that the timing mat at the start line was still on. However, the start line timing mat gets turned off after the start so Dave didn't get the start time he needed to record, explaining why he ended up getting a 4:19 instead because London Marathon gave him the gun time for the start time. So still cheating by Dave and Terrie, just incompetent cheating.

This can all be cleared up by Hugh at LM giving us the results of his investigation.

I

If he started at 11 rather than 10, then still no way could he have run it all.

Starts at 11 then runs to mile 9, then jumps on a bus maybe, or doubles back at half way.

Couldnt have run the whole course starting late as he cant run a 4:19.

Yeah, you are right. If Dave started an hour late to cheat, it would only make logical sense that he would have needed to take some kind of non-foot transport to make it in time for mile 9.

Another possibility is that Dave actually ran the whole London Marathon at the proper start time but that an accomplice held onto his timing chip at the start line and crossed over the line an hour after the start thinking he/she could get the chip start time they were looking for. Hmmmm, I need to double check the email chains I have to see if they place Terrie Reading at the London Marathon since they at least show that Dave was communicating to Terrie at the finish line. Will be interesting if I find evidence that Terrie was there.