Potentially Suspicious Runner To Run 836 Miles in 9 Days for "Charity"

Looks like there is at least another post going missing again....

They Are That Dumb wrote:

Terrie is also responding to some new comments on the Ultrarunning Community Facebook page.

https://m.facebook.com/groups/259647654139161?view=permalink&id=1129957913774793

Good to see the Ultrarunning Community Facebook page is allowing Dave and Terry to be scrutinized more, they are even have quotes from this thread posted.

Also, 10/10 for Lindley Chambers on there, looks like she's a race director and knows her stuff and put Terrie in her place four hours ago after T had replied to her.

Lindley, if you're reading this can you ask Terrie how her and Dave justify him blatantly lying to a double amputee war hero that he ran 3:12.

I have some disappointing news for you, Lindley is not female.

Lindley has balls (metaphorically speaking :) )

"Lindley Chambers

Good article that in fact pretty much calls him a liar without saying it.

Lindley Chambers

He has a history of cheating and scams and making stuff up. I have heard that they even changed their names to reading from something else to avoid previous debts and being chased. They have organised other events and squirreled away charity money. Lied about his running ability and been disqualified from several events now and is likely to get disqualified from London as well. He only appears in photos in two places and has no chip on him in either photo above.

We are looking at more than a Rob young running cheat here. It's more a fraudster in general.

Like · Report · Yesterday at 4:57pm

Mike Karthäuser

This cannot go anything other than badly for him whilst 'raising awareness'.

Like · Report · Yesterday at 4:59pm

Lindley Chambers

It will go badly as I think he has targeted what he thought was a good angle on the running challenges but I think not being part of the ultra running community he underestimated how passionate the community is. It's funny he now claims being bullied as a child and abused by a teacher for the sympathy I have had a hard life vote. Things are coming to light about his past and previous fraudulent charity events that will just Damn him even more.

Like · Report · Yesterday at 5:09pm

Terrie Reading

You really should get your facts right before you throw accusations around you know. The majority of your comment is so wrong.... also could you let me know what Dave has been disqualified from? So I can let him know. 😐

Like · Report · 6 hours ago

Lindley Chambers

So Bournemouth marathon have not removed his results due to impossible negative splits and obvious cheating? Then let's not mention Norwich half marathon where the photos he is in are of him finishing with runners taking over 2 hours but his chip time is 1:42 how did it happen that he was photographed at the finish in over 2 hours but his chip finished at a different time?

I have done my homework thanks.

Edited · Like · Report · 5 hours ago

Terrie Reading

Lindley Chambers as a race director you should know yourself that runners have no control over what time their chips Record. He has been banned from nothing, absolutely nothing.

Like · Report · 5 hours ago

Lindley Chambers

I didn't say banned. I said disqualified! Feel free to show me where his results are on the Bournemouth results page? I can't find them.

Like · Report · 5 hours ago

Lindley Chambers

Runners do have control over what their chips record. If they wear their own chip all, the way through the race then the photos and chip times match up. Daves don't seem to ever match up! As I race director I know how race timing works. They may be faulty and not work at all but they do not record different times unless you ran different times to what you claim.

Like · Report · 5 hours ago

Terrie Reading

Lindley Chambers Dave claimed the times he was given by both Norwich and Bournemouth. The same times that were recorded. If those times were incorrect it is down to the organisers to sort out as they obviously recorded them wrong on the web. As said Dave claimed the times he was given and that were recorded on the results page.

Like · Report · 5 hours ago

Lindley Chambers

Terrie you can make up stuff all you want to try and refute my evidence. He is not listed as finishing Bournemouth marathon. He is not on the results at all as he has been removed. That is a FACT. It's also a fact that his chip recorded a 1:42 time at Norwich but he is photographed finishing around 2 hours and 9 minutes. They did not record anything wrong chip timing is correct for his chip photographs have time stamps it's clear him and his chip finished at different times. These are facts. Denying them does not change that.

Edited · Like · Report · 4 hours ago

Rebecca Lawson

Wow. How unlucky is this guy with chips...

Like · 4 · Report · 3 hours ago"

Not Trans wrote:

I have some disappointing news for you, Lindley is not female.

In that case Lindley does have balls (hopefully for him). And no, not particularly disappointed, but thanks for pointing it out, they must be big ones.

Lindley is ex Army, so Dave's claiming to be ex special ops and the other military bullshit he went about will really stick in his craw, especially as the Dereham Times outing article only mentioned that Dave was in the Royal Air Force Reserve, so not even a weekend warrior.

Lindley has balls wrote:

Terrie Reading

Lindley Chambers Dave claimed the times he was given by both Norwich and Bournemouth. The same times that were recorded. If those times were incorrect it is down to the organisers to sort out as they obviously recorded them wrong on the web. As said Dave claimed the times he was given and that were recorded on the results page.

Like · Report · 5 hours ago

Haha, so you can cheat all you like and as long as the time gets recorded it's legit and you can claim it and it's all the organisers fault, WTF.

Troll.Pup.at.Altitude.9,333ft. wrote:

Takes all sorts I guess. wrote:

Sorry to repeat and repost, but I just can't see how anyone could stand in front of someone like Duncan on video and lie like that, it's beyond me.

The Brit UltraRunning Community needs to talk to Dave Reading/Shingler about this video interview.

Terrie Reading has deleted videos and websites about the LeJog WR RUN attempt which ended on day 2. There was nothing on the websites about Dave riding a BIKE on day 2 of his LeJog WR RUN attempt.

Terrie Reading stated at the time that the reason they stopped on Day 2 was because of a FAMILY EMERGENCY for the driver.

Terrie Reading now says that the reason they stopped on Day 2 was because of the MENTAL PRESSURE on the driver from internet trolls.

It is easy to avoid the mental pressure of internet trolls by not going to websites with internet trolls during a LeJog WR RUN attempt. Dave said that he was going to do 5 mph (~ Dave's 5 hour marathon PR pace) for 20 hours per day... for 8 days in a row. There should not be much free time for internet websites.

Internet trolls did not stop Pete Kostelnick during his WR run across the United States. The thread at LetsRun.com about Pete Kostelnick's WR run had his biggest fans.

Why?

Pete Kostelnick has won the Badwater 135 mile Ultrarace twice and has run over 163 miles in 24 hours. He is 29 years old. He was completely transparent with his data. There was never anything suspicious about Pete Kostelnick.

Dave Reading/Shingler is a 49 year old former smoker of 2 packs of cigarettes a day for over 40 years...who quit ~ 2 years ago.

It is easy to see that Pete Kostelnick is the real deal.

It is easy to see that Dave Reading/Shingler is a Brit Cheater-Liar-Fraudâ„¢.

I wonder if the news article has words that are too big for Terrie to comprehend or if she is seriously that deluded.

Terrie posts link to:

EDP 24

A Dereham father’s attempt to run from Land’s End to John O’Groats ended in controversy in April and accusations continue to fly.

-----------------

Frank Gagliardi

Why are you posting this article? It lays out a damning case against you.

------------------

John O'Groats to Lands End 2018 Ridiculously Long Run and Ride Challenge

No it doesn't.

Why is there so much Brit Ultra-Cheater-Liar-Fraudâ„¢?

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2016/jun/22/robert-young-marathon-record-attempt-cheating-rumors

Do you ever think about why the Brit Ultra-Running Community NEVER does ANYTHING to STOP IT???

Answer:

The Brit UltraRunning Community is lazy...and stupid.

The Brit Ultra-Cheater-Liar-Fraudâ„¢ is always exposed by trolls from the United States. For example, there is this 107 page thread on Dave and Terrie Reading/Shingler at LetsRun.com that you are reading at this present moment in time.

(It is easy and fun.)

Then the Brits finally print some articles in their tabloid newspapers.

The Brits are always really late to the Brit Ultra-Cheater-Liar-Fraud Partyâ„¢.

What sort of logic is that? wrote:

Lindley has balls wrote:

Terrie Reading

Lindley Chambers Dave claimed the times he was given by both Norwich and Bournemouth. The same times that were recorded. If those times were incorrect it is down to the organisers to sort out as they obviously recorded them wrong on the web. As said Dave claimed the times he was given and that were recorded on the results page.

Like · Report · 5 hours ago

Haha, so you can cheat all you like and as long as the time gets recorded it's legit and you can claim it and it's all the organisers fault, WTF.

QUESTION FOR TERRIE:

Terrie, your flawed logic is if the recorded time, however it was achieved, cheating or otherwise, is recorded on the organisers web page then it's OK for Dave to claim it and it's the organisers problem.

So answer me this, why then, when the 2016 London Marathon had a recorded time of 4:19, have you and Dave been knowingly lying and claiming a 3:12?

Don't know if Terrie still reads this thread so can someone post the above question on the Ultrarunning site. Thanks.

Seriously Deluded wrote:

I wonder if the news article has words that are too big for Terrie to comprehend or if she is seriously that deluded.

Both, but she's too thick to realise it, she actually thinks she's smarter than everyone else.

Here's the latest reply to her "No it doesn't" comment:

"Ross Woodward

It clearly does if anybody actually reads it and then does a bit of googling. And just to point out that showing somebody to be a liar, see claim to have run 3:12 at London, is not cyber bullying.

Like · 1 · Report · 54 minutes ago"

Didn't Dave receive $5,000 from a sponsor if he ran a marathon faster than 3:30?

Did Dave receive $5,000 from a sponsor for a fake 3:12 marathon (7:20 pace) marathon lie?

Troll.Pup.at.Altitude.9,033ft. wrote:

Why is there so much Brit Ultra-Cheater-Liar-Fraudâ„¢?

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2016/jun/22/robert-young-marathon-record-attempt-cheating-rumors

Do you ever think about why the Brit Ultra-Running Community NEVER does ANYTHING to STOP IT???

Answer:

The Brit UltraRunning Community is lazy...and stupid.

The Brit Ultra-Cheater-Liar-Fraudâ„¢ is always exposed by trolls from the United States. For example, there is this 107 page thread on Dave and Terrie Reading/Shingler at LetsRun.com that you are reading at this present moment in time.

(It is easy and fun.)

Then the Brits finally print some articles in their tabloid newspapers.

The Brits are always really late to the Brit Ultra-Cheater-Liar-Fraud Partyâ„¢.

Because generally British people wait, and make sure what they are saying is the truth. They don't jump to immediate conclusions.

But they often go too far with this on the Ultrarunning Community Facebook page and they kept removing threads mentioning these scams, ie they refused a thread that was started by KP Kelly and deleted it.

They should allow them but moderate to keep out lies and keep it civil, and eventually if these scammers are proved to be scammers, this is what they do.

It was eventually allowed to speak about Rob Young, Mark Vaz, and now the Readings.

Though this is all dictated by the self appointed running Gods on there.

If THEY agree a subject can be discussed, then the others flock like sheep to agree with them. These self appointed twits could post they ate a piece of chocolate and 2,000 idiots would tick like, just to be seen to be cool. Pathetic

Wait a minute.

Hey Brit UltraRunning Community and British Press.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASp7N3nl8Ao

What is going on over there in Britain?

This video with Robert Young (Brit-Ultra-Cheater-Liar-Fraudâ„¢) looks like an episode from Monty Python.

Question for Terrie. wrote:

What sort of logic is that? wrote:

Haha, so you can cheat all you like and as long as the time gets recorded it's legit and you can claim it and it's all the organisers fault, WTF.

QUESTION FOR TERRIE:

Terrie, your flawed logic is if the recorded time, however it was achieved, cheating or otherwise, is recorded on the organisers web page then it's OK for Dave to claim it and it's the organisers problem.

So answer me this, why then, when the 2016 London Marathon had a recorded time of 4:19, have you and Dave been knowingly lying and claiming a 3:12?

Don't know if Terrie still reads this thread so can someone post the above question on the Ultrarunning site. Thanks.

apparently they are not claiming the 3:12 now

you know the 3:12 that did not appear in the organizers web page

that they were claiming

but they have not admitted to lying about yet

which they did numerous times

and on video to a war hero

you know the sort of person Dave was supposed to be helping

more Terrie flawed logic by not admitting lying

the 3:12 came up as an app on their mobile lol

which made it OK to claim

just like with the race organizers web sites with cheated times

If you look at Dave's London Marathon 2016 photos, he isn't carrying a phone. He is a liar for claiming he used a phone to time himself.

No Tracker, No Phone wrote:

If you look at Dave's London Marathon 2016 photos, he isn't carrying a phone. He is a liar for claiming he used a phone to time himself.

"He says he is no longer telling people he ran it in 3 hours 12 minutes. He says he got that time from an app on his phone but admits there is “no evidence” of that now."

Easy to get confused between 3:12 and 4:19, lol.

You're right, he's a liar.