I'm looking for a cushioned shoe that I can use for longer easy runs. I'm between the Vomero 12 and Lunarepic 2. Any thoughts on these shoes would be appreciated.
I'm looking for a cushioned shoe that I can use for longer easy runs. I'm between the Vomero 12 and Lunarepic 2. Any thoughts on these shoes would be appreciated.
Seriously, I know this wasn't one of your two options, but take a look at the Clifton 3 (or 2 if price is too high). Best high cushioned shoe out there, especially for bigger/heavier guys.
Not a big Hoka fan but thanks for the reply.
Any thoughts on these shoes?
I've had both; I don't think the Vomero update was especially good. It's still pretty firm underfoot compared to some of the really soft early versions. The Lunar Epic 2 I've only run in 3x, but it's softer and the upper fits nicely. It's a bit more expensive, but I think a much better shoe.
i've turned a bit sour on the vomero line - they just lose the shock absorption too soon (300 miles on my last pair and they jar my legs). haven't tried the lunarepic, but have like the other lunar line of shoes.
+1 on the cliftons, which i use for long runs.
i've replaced the vomeros as my "daily" shoe with adidas supernova (a.k.a. glide 9) and i'm still quite happy with that choice, now approaching 200 miles.
Hi,
Try the new saucony triumph iso 3, a comfortable and responsive shoe.
Cheers
Steve
I just add I compared the vomero 12 to the saucony iso 3. The vomero wasn't as responsive especially for running up hill, I seem to run out of steam a little quicker. The saucony is a bit more roomy and better shock absorbing and quite comfortable. Durability according to reviewers is quite good too. The saucony has everrun in the heal a bit like boost for Adidas. All the best .
Cheers
Steve
Vomero is gonna run you 140 and the lunarepic 2 160.
So I say, whats holding you back from going with a neutral Adidas?
I think the Supernova or energy boost would do you wonders. Those two shoes compare well.
Also the guy who Mentioned the Sacuony, I would agree thats another good choice.
Go to a local running store and try them on and see which ones you like the most.
Hi,
I agree the Adidas shoes are good too. I tried various shoes before buying the saucony, it took me about a month to decide. These are my thoughts when comparing them, I hope you don't mind me adding some of my personal comments on each on how they suited me. I have a bulging disc issue and easily get sore heals and I needed a shoes that wouldn't make those conditions worse when running or power walking.
The energy boost 3 a very responsive shoe, but were a bit narrow and a little to firm for my liking. The ultraboost st, a very soft and comfortable but not as responsive as the energy boost - but my right heal slipped in those. The straight ultraboost but doesn't have much support. The new supernova are nice but they are bit slow and a little bulky in the heal ( good for slow runs) and little tight in the mid foot for me.
I did buy a Adidas response boost 3 (on sale 40% off) , they have more of the comfort of the ultraboost and quite responsive but not as much cushioned. I use them as a backup to the saucony. One shoe I haven't tried which people said are nice is the asics dynaflyte. I did try the brooks glycerin 14, nice but seem to get hot and the front feet tend get a little sore. I tried the Nike pegusus 32 and 33 sore back and shins after 5 mins.
The saucony iso 3 are a god mix of comfort and very cushioned and quite responsive - so far it hasn't made my back sore after a run
Cheers
Steve.