BREAKING: Trump Nominates Judge Neil Gorsuch to Supreme Court

Terrible choice. But at least he's not a krazy pro-lifer.

Why does everyone on here post articles from Breitbart to cite information?? Educate yourselves by reading literally anything else.

fakenews wrote:

Why does everyone on here post articles from Breitbart to cite information?? Educate yourselves by reading literally anything else.

Which other media outlet got the election right?

I trust those who are right wrote:

fakenews wrote:

Why does everyone on here post articles from Breitbart to cite information?? Educate yourselves by reading literally anything else.

Which other media outlet got the election right?

You mean the media outlet run by Steve Bannon, Trump's head advisor, picked Trump to win? That's amazing! They're probably objective and trustworthy about everything!

New Trump slogan: Make liberals miserable. I love how miserable they are right now. Living and growing up in the country this whole thing feels fantastic. We love Trump!

Solid pick. The dems will fall in line and confirm. Trump wins again.

MAGA!!!

Does Jamin approve?

What about Peter Schiff?

true conservative wrote:

49 yo. That translates to almost 50 years in SC.

Thank you, Trump!

You must really be stupid. The odds are he won't serve more than 40 years, and it might be much less than that. His mother died at 62.

MattyK wrote:

New Trump slogan: Make liberals miserable. I love how miserable they are right now. Living and growing up in the country this whole thing feels fantastic. We love Trump!

This!

The protestors had professionally printed anti-Gorsuch signs within minutes of the announcement. They were going to protest whoever the nominee was. Pathetic.

the latest display of loon wrote:

The protestors had professionally printed anti-Gorsuch signs within minutes of the announcement. They were going to protest whoever the nominee was. Pathetic.

Trump gave them the heads-up that 8pm was the time.

Confirmed by Senate for appellate court in 2006. Those voting yea included Senators Schumer, Clinton, Kerry, Biden, and Obama..

some good after al wrote:

Terrible choice. But at least he's not a krazy pro-lifer.

Funny how this appointee defends the Constitution, blah blah blah.

Doing that last night, means you get fired!

Facstics.

significantly to the right of Scalia. A no brainer to deny putting this character on the bench for thirty years or more when the moderate Garland was denied even a hearing.

Why you so afraid, school teacher. You not like vouchers? Freedom of choice? Being evaluated on the merits of what you produce? I know, a businessman scares the crap out of people who may have to retain their job on the merits of their production. Keep running.

What is to keep Dems who may hold a future majority from blocking nominations of Repub presidents for 2 or even 3 years? It's not that far off that an "election cycle" might be considered a 2 year process in the near future.

the latest display of loon wrote:

The protestors had professionally printed anti-Gorsuch signs within minutes of the announcement. They were going to protest whoever the nominee was. Pathetic.

Protesters are one thing.

How about a Senate majority leader that wouldn't hold a vote to confirm a SC nominee whoever the nominee was?

You must agree that that is more pathetic considering it involves real power.

Gorsuch will go through official vetting and be confirmed in a few months.

He doesn't seem to be totally crazy pick. Probably an upgrade from Scalia.

Next

jjjjjjj wrote:

significantly to the right of Scalia. A no brainer to deny putting this character on the bench for thirty years or more when the moderate Garland was denied even a hearing.

You're such a hoot. Sorry you'll lose the ability to force your woman to vivisect your unsprung offspring?

How about a Senate majority leader that wouldn't hold a vote to confirm a SC nominee whoever the nominee was?

He was just following the (former) advice of the Vice President (also President of the Senate).